
Free Daily Podcast Summary
by Dr. Benedikt Wisniewski
Get key takeaways, quotes, and insights from Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer in a 5-minute read. Delivered straight to your inbox.
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
Thema: Growth MindsetUm diese Studie geht es: Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.-y., & Hong, Y.-y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285.Weitere Forschung:Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571.Macnamara, B. N., & Burgoyne, A. P. (2023). Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 38, 100503.
In dieser Spezialfolge unterhalte ich mich mit dem Bildungsjournalisten Alexander Brand über seine Reise in die erfolgreichsten Bildungssysteme der Welt, sein Buch „Die Bildungsweltmeister“ und die Frage, was wir aus Ländern wie Finnland oder Singapur für unser eigenes Bildungssystem lernen können.im Online-Buchhandel:"Die Bildungsweltmeister" von Alexander Brandab 16.07.2026: "Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer": Das Buch zum Podcast
Thema: PersönlichkeitsentwicklungUm diese Studie geht es: Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006).Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 32(1), 1–25.Weitere Forschung:Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.Magidson, J. F., Roberts, B. W., Collado-Rodriguez, A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2014). Theory-driven intervention for changing personality: Expectancy value theory, behavioral activation, and conscientiousness. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1442–1450.
Thema: MethodenvielfaltUm diese Studie geht es:Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. C. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Journal of Cognition, 7(1), 1–15. Erwähnt:Helmke, A., & Jäger, R. (2002). Das Projekt MARKUS. Mathematik-Gesamterhebung Rheinland-Pfalz: Kompetenzen, Unterrichtsmerkmale, Schulkontext. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.Krammer, K. (2021). Methodenvielfalt im Unterricht und ihre Wirkung auf Lernerfolg (Masterarbeit). Universität Graz. https://unipub.uni-graz.at/obvugrhs/content/titleinfo/6802188/full.pdfMeyer, H. (2004). Was ist guter Unterricht? Berlin: Cornelsen.Huber, S. G., & Hader-Popp, S. (2008). Unterrichtsentwicklung durch Methodenvielfalt im Unterricht fördern. http://schulegestalten.net/pdf/Huber-HaderPopp-2008-UnterrichtsentwicklungDurchMethodenvielfaltImUnterrichtF%C3%B6rdern.pdfWeitere Forschung:Mills, C. M., & Keil, F. C. (2004). Knowing the limits of one’s understanding: The development of an illusion of explanatory depth. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(1), 1–32. Zemla, J. C., Sloman, S. A., Bechlivanidis, C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2024). Subjective understanding is reduced by mechanistic explanation. Journal of Cognition, 7(1), 1–15.
Thema: AnschaulichkeitUm diese Studie geht es:Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434.Weitere Forschung: Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 320(5875), 454–455. Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 216–237.
Thema: Vertrauen in WissenschaftUm diese Studie geht es:Schmidt, K., Rosman, T., Cramer, C., Besa, K. S., & Merk, S. (2022). Teachers trust educational science – Especially if it confirms their beliefs. Frontiers in Education, 976556.Intro:Whitaker, T. (2009). Was erfolgreiche Lehrer anders machen. Weinheim: Beltz.Zum Confirmation Bias:Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140. Weitere Forschung:Carnine, D. (2000). Why education experts resist effective practices (And what it would take to make education more like medicine). Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.Rosman, T., & Merk, S. (2021). Teacher’s Reasons for Trust and Distrust in Scientific Evidence: Reflecting a “Smart But Evil” Stereotype?. AERA Open, 7, 23328584211028599.
Um diese Studie geht es:Luo, L., Kiewra, K. A., Flanigan, A. E., & Peteranetz, M. S. (2018). Laptop versus longhand note taking: Effects on lecture notes and achievement. Instructional Science, 46, 947–971.Erwähnt:Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological science, 25(6), 1159-1168.Weitere Forschung:Allen, M., LeFebvre, L., LeFebvre, L., & Bourhis, J. (2020). Is the pencil mightier than the keyboard? A meta-analysis comparing the method of notetaking outcomes. Southern Communication Journal, 85(3), 143-154.Horbury, S. R., & Edmonds, C. J. (2021). Taking class notes by hand compared to typing: Effects on children’s recall and understanding. Journal of research in childhood education, 35(1), 55-67.
Um diese Studie geht es:Bennewitz, H., & Wegner, L. (2017). Empirische Arbeit: " Er tut sich einfach schwer.". Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 64(4), 270-281. Wahrnehmung von Elterngesprächen auf beiden Seiten:Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (2003). The essential conversation: What parents and teachers can learn from each other. New York: Ballantine Books.Baker, C. & Keogh, J. (1995). Accounting for achievement in parent-teacher interviews. Human Studies, 18(2-3), 263-300.Cheatham, G. A. & Ostrosky, M. M. (2013). Goal setting during early childhood parent-teacher conferences: A comparison of three groups of parents. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27(2), 166-189Weitere Forschung:Gartmeier, M., Gebhardt, M., Dotger, B., & Schratz, M. (2016).Teachers’ communication competence: A latent class analysis of 677 German mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 56–67. Munthe, E., & Westergård, E. (2023).Parents’, teachers’, and students’ roles in parent-teacher conferences: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 136, 104355.
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Listeners also like.
In diesem Podcast geht es um Forschung zu Schule und Unterricht, die jede Lehrerin und jeder Lehrer kennen sollte.In jeder Folge stelle ich Ihnen eine Studie, ein Review oder eine Metaanalyse vor, die für didaktische und pädagogische Erwägungen von Praktikerinnen und Praktikern relevant ist. Dabei gehe ich sowohl auf 'Klassiker' als auch auf aktuelle Forschung ein.Ich bin Schulpsychologe, nebenbei seit vielen Jahren in der Forschung tätig und habe früher zwölf Jahre lang selbst unterrichtet.https://bsky.app/profile/benwisniewski.bsky.social
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Get key takeaways from Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer in a 5-minute read.
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Dr. Benedikt Wisniewski.
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts. Upgrade to Pro for 15, or Premium for 50. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer publishes monthly. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
Psychologie fürs Klassenzimmer covers topics including Science. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.