
In this episode, Anna Stokke explores what to do when a math program or education initiative doesn’t seem to work, but you’re told "research shows" that it does. Drawing on her personal experience as both a parent and educator navigating “research shows” claims, Anna explains how parents, teachers, and advocates can ask for evidence, evaluate what counts as credible research, and respond when weak claims are presented with confidence. This episode is based on a presentation she gave at researchED Toronto in 2025. Anna unpacks common tactics used to shut these conversations down, including shifting the burden of proof, overwhelming people with endless references, credential deflection, and denying that poor practice exists at all. She also offers practical advice for parents and educators on how to counter these tactics and spot and stop the spread of bad ideas in education. This is an essential conversation for anyone trying to push for better practice in schools and navigate resistance along the way. This episode is available in video at www.youtube.com/@chalktalk-stokke A Substack version of this episode, written by Anna Stokke, as a guest writer for the Center for Educational Progress is available at https://www.educationprogress.org/p/what-to-do-when-research-shows-shuts TIMESTAMPS [00:00:22] Introduction [00:01:35] What to do when something doesn’t feel right [00:02:48] Why Anna got involved in math education advocacy [00:06:38] Understanding the phrase “Research shows” in education [00:07:01] The Wildfire Effect: How bad ideas spread [00:09:25] How to ask for evidence [00:09:57] Burden of proof fallacy [00:11:04] Firehose Effect: Overwhelming you with articles [00:12:16] Overcoming the Firehose Effect [00:13:01] Credential deflection [00:14:59] Gaslighting: When you’re told the problem doesn’t exist [00:16:11] Evaluating the evidence [00:17:50] Fuzzy terms: Critical thinking, conceptual understanding, number sense, curiosity, differentiation [00:19:26] Become informed [00:18:36] Resources that can help [00:20:16] Final thoughts RELEVANT PREVIOUS EPISODES Red flags in education research with Ben Solomon https://www.podbean.com/ew/pb-cp5xt-156072c Mailbag: Building Thinking Classrooms, number talks & more with Zach Groshell https://www.podbean.com/ew/pb-stw9g-186807f Modern relevance in the math curriculum with Brian Conrad https://www.podbean.com/ew/pb-gek66-148967a RELEVANT RESOURCES The Institute of Education Sciences Practice Guide https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguides The National Mathematics Advisory Panel Final Report https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED500486.pdf Education Endowment Foundation https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/ The National Center on Intensive Intervention https://intensiveintervention.org/ EPISODE TRANSCRIPT https://www.annastokke.com/transcripts/ep-70-transcript MUSIC Intro & Outro: Funk Jazz Big Band - ColorFilmMusic Website: www.annastokke.com FB: Chalk & Talk IG: @chalkandtalkpodcast Tiktok: @chalkandtalkpodcast X: @rastokke LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/anna-stokke-3a1b4c Bluesky: @rastokke.bsky.social
AI Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

We know more about teaching than ever—so why is change so slow? with Joanna Barbousas (Ep 69)

The Finland myth, East Asia’s rise, and what makes education systems work with Montserrat Gomendio (Ep 68)

Cognitive load theory and learning math with John Sweller (Ep 67)

Desirable difficulties for learning with Elizabeth Bjork and Robert Bjork (Ep 66)
Free AI-powered recaps of Chalk & Talk and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.