
In this special Supreme Court edition of Unwritten Law, NCLA President and Chief Legal Officer Mark Chenoweth and Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione are joined by NCLA Of Counsel Margot Cleveland to discuss the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Trump v. Slaughter.The Court's decision effectively ends Humphrey's Executor, the 1935 precedent that limited the President's authority to remove leaders of independent agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission. Margot, who authored NCLA's amicus brief supporting the President's position, explains why the decision represents one of the Court's most significant separation-of-powers rulings in decades.The discussion explores how the Court built on earlier decisions such as Seila Law, why Chief Justice Roberts described Myers v. United States as the foundational precedent for presidential removal authority, and what the decision means for the future of the administrative state.Mark, John, and Margot also examine Justice Gorsuch's concurrence, severability, the unresolved questions surrounding the Federal Reserve and the civil service, and why the Court appears to be methodically restoring presidential control over executive officers.The episode concludes with a look ahead at the next constitutional battles likely to follow in the wake of Trump v. Slaughter.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Should SCOTUS Revisit Its 120-Year-Old Vaccine Precedent?

Can the Government Escape Accountability for Censorship?

Can Agency Commentary Increase Your Prison Sentence?

SCOTUS Special (Part 3): A Major Win for Digital Privacy
Free AI-powered recaps of Unwritten Law and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.