Free Daily Podcast Summary
Unwritten Law: Daily Summaries Delivered
by Mark Chenoweth & John Vecchione
Every day, unelected federal agencies make decisions that affect your job, your business, your speech, your property, and your constitutional rights—often without Congress ever voting on them. From the rules that govern small businesses to the regulations that shape everyday life, the modern administrative state reaches further than most Americans realize.On Unwritten Law, constitutional lawyers Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione break down the biggest legal battles involving federal agencies, government overreach, and the Constitution. Each episode explores real cases challenging the expanding power of the administrative state, explaining how these disputes affect ordinary Americans, businesses, and the future of limited government.Whether the topic is the Supreme Court, free speech, property rights, due process, jury trials, executive power, or the separation of powers, Unwritten Law explains the legal issues behind today's biggest constitutional debates in clear, accessible languag
Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- 5 days ago16 min
Trump's New York Fraud Case Raises First Amendment Concerns
Can New York punish someone for an inaccurate business statement even when no one was deceived, no one relied on it, and no one suffered a financial loss?That's the First Amendment issue NCLA is raising in the New York civil fraud case against President Donald Trump.NCLA has submitted an amicus brief to New York's highest court challenging the constitutionality of Executive Law § 63(12), a sweeping statute that NCLA argues allows the state attorney general to punish mere inaccuracies without proving the traditional elements of fraud, including intent to deceive, reliance, and harm.On this episode of Unwritten Law, Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione welcome NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel Caitlin Moyna, who authored the brief, to explain why the law poses a threat to free speech far beyond this particular dispute.They discuss the enormous financial penalty originally imposed against Trump, the intermediate appellate court's decision to strike down that monetary award, and the danger of giving government officials broad discretion to target individuals and businesses.NCLA's concern isn't limited to Trump. A law that gives prosecutors the power to punish harmless mistakes can threaten anyone's freedom of speech.The case is headed to oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals on January 5.
- 1 weeks ago28 min
Corner Post: A Small Gas Station Takes Down a Federal Reserve Rule
A small North Dakota gas station challenged a Federal Reserve regulation that had been on the books before the business even existed. After winning a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 2024, Corner Post's challenge has now resulted in another major victory.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling invalidating the Federal Reserve's debit-card interchange fee cap because the agency failed to follow the limits Congress established.On this episode of Unwritten Law, Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione welcome NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel Kara Rollins to discuss the latest development in Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.They explain how debit-card transaction fees work, why the Federal Reserve exceeded its statutory authority, and how the Supreme Court's decisions in Corner Post and Loper Bright are reshaping challenges to federal regulations.The discussion also examines a troubling trend: After the Supreme Court overturned Chevron deference, federal agencies have increasingly defended their regulatory authority by claiming broad discretion instead.The central principle is simple: Congress writes the laws. Agencies must follow them.
- 1 weeks ago26 min
Can Agency Guidance Add Time to Your Prison Sentence?
Can government officials effectively increase someone's prison sentence through guidance that never went through the same approval process as the law itself?That's the issue at the heart of Beaird v. United States, a case recently argued before the U.S. Supreme Court.Federal judges use sentencing guidelines to determine the appropriate punishment for criminal offenses. But under a legal doctrine known as Stinson deference, judges must also defer to the Sentencing Commission's commentary interpreting those guidelines—even though that commentary does not necessarily undergo public review or the same congressional oversight as the guidelines themselves.And those interpretations can mean more time behind bars.On this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA President and Chief Legal Officer Mark Chenoweth and Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione welcome Senior Litigation Counsel Kara Rollins to discuss the Supreme Court's oral arguments and NCLA's amicus brief opposing Stinson deference.They explore why the Justices appeared more divided than expected, how sentencing commentary can affect prison terms, and whether the Court's eventual decision could weaken the principles established in Loper Bright, which overturned Chevron deference.When someone's freedom is on the line, should judges independently interpret the law—or defer to an unelected commission's commentary?
- 1 weeks ago18 min
Federal Agency Bans Lobbyist Who Challenged Its Chairman
A longtime Washington lobbyist raises concerns with a federal agency, takes those concerns to the White House, and nearly a year later finds himself banned from the agency's offices.The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) labeled Edward Krenik a “credible threat” to agency personnel and operations, but according to NCLA's lawsuit, never explained what he supposedly did to deserve the ban or gave him an opportunity to defend himself.On this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA's John Vecchione and Mark Chenoweth welcome Senior Litigation Counsel Kara Rollins to discuss Krenik v. Feldman, NCLA's new lawsuit challenging the agency's actions.They examine Krenik's First Amendment rights to free speech and to petition the government, the possibility of retaliation for his advocacy, and the serious consequences the ban has had for his livelihood.Can a federal agency shut someone out simply because it doesn't like what he has to say?
- 3 weeks ago21 min
Federal Judges Cannot Shield U.S. Attorneys from Presidential Removal
Can the president fire a federal prosecutor appointed by judges?That's the constitutional question at the center of Trump v. Rogoff, a dispute now before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.After federal judges appointed Roger Rogoff as U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Washington, President Trump fired him less than an hour later. Rogoff sued, arguing that the president lacked the authority to remove a court-appointed prosecutor. A district court granted a preliminary injunction in Rogoff's favor, but the Ninth Circuit stayed that order while the appeal proceeds.On this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA President and Chief Legal Officer Mark Chenoweth and Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione welcome Senior Litigation Counsel Jacob Huebert to discuss NCLA's newly filed amicus brief.NCLA argues that the president has the constitutional authority to remove U.S. attorneys, regardless of who appointed them. The brief also raises a broader constitutional concern: whether federal judges should be appointing executive-branch prosecutors in the first place.Mark, John, and Jacob examine the Supreme Court's recent Trump v. Slaughter decision, the separation of powers, the role of the Senate in confirming federal prosecutors, and why this dispute could have implications far beyond Washington State.
- 3 weeks ago24 min
Can the SEC Block Your Right to a Jury Trial?
Can the government deny you a jury trial—and then refuse to let you challenge that denial in federal court?NCLA is asking the Supreme Court to hear Smith v. SEC, a case challenging the constitutional limits of administrative adjudication and the procedural barriers that can prevent Americans from asserting their rights.On this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA President and Chief Legal Officer Mark Chenoweth and Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione are joined by Senior Litigation Counsel Russ Ryan to discuss the newly filed Supreme Court cert petition.NCLA client Eric Smith was sanctioned through a FINRA disciplinary proceeding without a jury or an Article III judge. The SEC subsequently affirmed the sanctions after years of delay.When Smith sought review in the Sixth Circuit, NCLA argued that the proceedings violated constitutional protections recognized by the Supreme Court in SEC v. Jarkesy. But the appeals court declined to consider the constitutional challenge because Smith had not first presented it to the SEC.NCLA is asking the Supreme Court to resolve disagreements among federal appeals courts over whether Americans must raise structural constitutional objections before administrative agencies—and whether they can be excused from doing so when the agency has already made clear that the argument would be futile.Mark, John, and Russ explain why this dispute matters far beyond Eric Smith, why administrative agencies should not be the gatekeepers of constitutional challenges to their own proceedings, and what happens next as NCLA asks the Justices to hear the case.
- 3 weeks ago16 min
Jack Smith, Secret Subpoenas, and Senator Blackburn's Phone Records
What happens when a federal investigator secretly obtains a U.S. senator's phone records—and prevents her from challenging the search?NCLA has filed a lawsuit on behalf of Senator Marsha Blackburn against former Special Counsel Jack Smith, challenging his acquisition of her telephone records during the Arctic Frost investigation.On this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione is joined by NCLA attorney Caitlin Moyna to discuss the lawsuit, the constitutional protections at stake, and the extraordinary circumstances surrounding the subpoenas.According to NCLA's complaint, Smith sought telephone records belonging to members of Congress, identifying the targets by their phone numbers rather than their names. His team also obtained nondisclosure orders preventing telephone providers from alerting anyone about the subpoenas. NCLA alleges that investigators failed to tell the court that the records belonged to sitting members of Congress.The lawsuit argues that these actions violated the Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause, which protects legislative independence from executive interference, as well as the Fourth Amendment. NCLA also challenges the constitutionality of Smith's appointment as Special Counsel.John and Caitlin discuss why these protections matter, what newly disclosed documents suggest about the government's awareness of congressional privileges, and why Senator Blackburn is seeking accountability rather than a large monetary award.They also explain an unusual development: all four district judges in the Middle District of Tennessee have recused themselves from the lawsuit.At stake is a fundamental question about separation of powers: Can executive-branch investigators circumvent constitutional protections designed to safeguard Congress from government interference?
- 3 weeks ago8 min
Judge Newman's Fight Takes a Major Turn After 3 Years
After more than three years, Judge Pauline Newman's judicial conduct and disability proceeding has been transferred out of the Federal Circuit.It's a significant and unprecedented development in a case that NCLA has been fighting since 2023.On this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione and Andy Morris discuss the newly disclosed order from Eleventh Circuit Chief Judge William Pryor confirming that Judge Newman's proceeding has been transferred to the Eleventh Circuit.Judge Newman has sought a transfer since April 2023, arguing that judges involved in the controversy should not adjudicate the proceeding themselves. Now, after multiple orders, suspensions, and years of litigation, a different judicial council will handle the matter.John and Andy explain:Why Judge Newman sought a transfer in the first placeWhat the Eleventh Circuit's new order revealsWhy a transfer after more than three years is unprecedentedWhat remains confidential about the proceedingWhy Judge Newman requested broader public disclosureWhat the transfer means for the next phase of her caseWhy this development does not yet change her status on the benchThe transfer raises important questions about judicial impartiality, accountability, and the procedures used to investigate federal judges.What happens next for Judge Newman? John and Andy explain what they can—and cannot—say about this major development.Subscribe to Unwritten Law for updates on this case and NCLA's work defending constitutional rights.
Get Unwritten Law summaries in your inbox
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
You Might Also Like
Listeners also like.
Stanford Legal
Experts from Stanford Law explore constitutional law, voting rights, and landmark Supreme Court cases shaping democracy and civil rights.
Law and Chaos
Legal journalists analyze pivotal courtroom cases and their impact on American democracy.
Is This Really Legal?
A legal expert breaks down current events and constitutional issues to clarify what’s actually allowed under U.S. law.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Reads and analyzes Supreme Court decision syllabi verbatim, focusing on the court's official summaries without commentary or hype.
The Counsel
A former prosecutor analyzes high-profile legal cases and the intersection of law, politics, and current events.
The Oath and The Office
A political science professor and a comedian analyze presidential power, constitutional threats, and democracy in American politics.
UNBIASED Politics
A former attorney provides impartial summaries of U.S. political news, elections, and legal developments with clear explanations of constitutional issues.
American Law Cafe
Breaks down core legal concepts, landmark cases, and doctrines in clear, accessible discussions for law students and legal enthusiasts.
Executive Functions Chat
Bob Bauer and Jack Goldsmith discuss news about the presidency.
Democracy Decoded
Analyzes constitutional issues in American democracy, including voting rights, presidential power, and checks and balances, through expert discussions.
What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law
A law professor explains U.S. constitutional principles through the legal challenges and actions of the Trump administration.
Bloomberg Law
Legal analysis from prominent attorneys and scholars on current cases and news-shaping issues, hosted by June Grasso.
About Unwritten Law
Every day, unelected federal agencies make decisions that affect your job, your business, your speech, your property, and your constitutional rights—often without Congress ever voting on them. From the rules that govern small businesses to the regulations that shape everyday life, the modern administrative state reaches further than most Americans realize.On Unwritten Law, constitutional lawyers Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione break down the biggest legal battles involving federal agencies, government overreach, and the Constitution. Each episode explores real cases challenging the expanding power of the administrative state, explaining how these disputes affect ordinary Americans, businesses, and the future of limited government.Whether the topic is the Supreme Court, free speech, property rights, due process, jury trials, executive power, or the separation of powers, Unwritten Law explains the legal issues behind today's biggest constitutional debates in clear, accessible languag
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from Unwritten Law in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's Unwritten Law daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of Unwritten Law as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the Unwritten Law podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official Unwritten Law product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Mark Chenoweth & John Vecchione.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts, any in the catalog. Basic raises that to 15, Pro to 40 and Max to 100. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
What topics does Unwritten Law cover?
Unwritten Law covers topics including News, Education, Business, Government, Politics. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting Unwritten Law summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.