
The NAEP proficiency levels were arbitrarily defined (Bracey, 2008; Ravitch, 2012; Reinking, Hruby, & Risko, 2023). These levels should be interpreted with extreme caution (Vaulton, 2025). The National Center for Education Statistics website provides three reasons for this (NCES, 2025):1. Proficiency levels are based on desired expectations. Meaning that these levels are aspirational not mathematical.2. These proficiency levels are currently being used on a trial basis.3. Further evidence is needed to determine if these proficiency levels are “reasonable, valid, and informative”.If you’re looking for accessible, research-based information that slices through the endless loads of overly worded baloney, I would encourage you to subscribe to my free Substack, The Reading Instruction Show. Substack: The Reading Instruction Showhttps://thereadinginstructionshow.substack.com/
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Quiet, Piggy: A Trumpian Response to Science of Reading Critics

Recognizing Words, the Three-Cueing System, and Identifying Words

Reading and the Information Processing Model: Why Penguins Continue to Mishear What I Say

Little Timmy, Round-Robin Reading, and Kindly, Old Mrs. Peterson
Free AI-powered recaps of The Reading Instruction Show and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.