'Not Paying The Piper' & 'Laughing at a Lawyer' & 'Suit Minus Pants Equal Lawsuit'

First, the plaintiff dated the defendant, but they broke up because she cheated on him and threw a statue at his head. They lived together in his family’s building, and they agreed to share expenses. He’s suing for rent, utilities, the cost of a diamond ring, food expenses, and a refrigerator door replacement. The defendant argues the plaintiff kicked her out of the apartment in the middle of the night, and she took him to court for an illegal eviction. She doesn’t think she owes. Then, the defendant hired the plaintiff, a lawyer, to represent her in a civil case. He claims the defendant won’t pay him because they lost, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff guaranteed he would win the case. She appealed the decision and won, so she doesn’t think she owes because she has already paid him a ton of money in fees. Plus, the plaintiff dropped off his designer suit pants and at the defendant’s dry-cleaning business. He says the defendant lost his pants, which makes the rest of the suit unwearable. He’s suing for the cost of a new suit. The defendant argues he tried looking for the pants and he offered the plaintiff money for the missing trousers. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices