
First, the plaintiffs paid the defendant to watch their dogs while they went on vacation. When they went to pick up their pets, the defendant told them one of the dogs got hit by a car and died. They’re suing for the cost of the dog. The defendant argues he offered to refund the dog-sitting fees and buy them a new dog. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to serve a mechanic with legal papers, but the defendant messed up the job. She’s suing for her money back. The defendant argues he did the job just fine and handed over the correct paperwork. Plus, the plaintiff sold a car to the defendant. He claims the defendant wrote a bad check and it bounced. He’s suing for the amount he’s owed. The defendant argues the car died the next died and was a lemon. He refuses to pay the remainder. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

'Being a Real Ghoul' & 'Having No Sole'

'Not Paying The Piper' & 'Laughing at a Lawyer' & 'Suit Minus Pants Equal Lawsuit'

'Fake'n The Bake'n' & 'Perturbing a Private Eye' & 'Maximum Unsatisfaction'

'Having a Sensitive Nose' & 'A Credit Card Fiasco' & 'Selling a Sour Car'
Free AI-powered recaps of The People’s Court Podcast and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.