One federal office complex is becoming a test case for a larger question: how should government measure the value of the property it owns?
A planning panel has recommended replacing the Forrestal Building and redeveloping the site with a mix of housing, commercial and public uses. The proposal is also raising broader questions about how government measures the long-term value of federal property. Joining me to discuss what's behind the plan and what it could mean for federal real estate are David Winstead of the Public Buildings Reform Board and Diane Sullivan of the National Capital Planning Commission.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Listen to This Episode
More from The Federal Drive with Terry Gerton
Lawmakers are still in the dark about what Golden Dome would entail
Lawmakers surface Coast Guard housing, quality-of-life issues
Artificial intelligence is making it easier to create fake identities and harder for agencies to tell who's real
When military information and financial incentives meet, a forecasting tool can become something else entirely
Get summaries like this every morning.
Free AI-powered recaps of The Federal Drive with Terry Gerton and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.