Free Daily Podcast Summary
SCOTUScast: Daily Summaries Delivered
by The Federalist Society
Get key takeaways, quotes, and insights from SCOTUScast in a 5-minute read. Delivered straight to your inbox.
Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- Apr 2, 202519 min
Glossip v. Oklahoma - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
On February 25, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 5-3 opinion in Glossip v. Oklahoma. The Court held that the prosecution violated its constitutional obligation to correct false testimony under Napue v. Illinois. and the Court has the jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals.Please join us in discussing the decision and its future implications.Featuring:Zack Smith, Legal Fellow and Manager, Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy Program, The Heritage Foundation
- Mar 24, 202534 min
Williams v. Reed - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
On February 21, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 9-0 opinion in Williams v. Reed. The Court held that state courts may not deny those claims on failure-to-exhaust grounds when a state court’s application of a state exhaustion requirement in effect immunizes state officials from 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims challenging delays in the administrative process.Please join us in discussing the decision and its future implications.Featuring:Prof. Tyler Lindley, Associate Professor of Law, Brigham Young University J. Reuben Clark Law School
- Mar 19, 202524 min
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
On February 26, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 9-0 opinion in Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. The Court held that in a trademark infringement suit under the Lanham Act the court, when awarding the "defendant’s profits" to the prevailing plaintiff, can award only profits ascribable to the "defendant" itself.Please join us in discussing the decision and its future implications.Featuring:Prof. Jake Linford, Loula Fuller & Dan Myers Professor and Associate Dean for Research, Florida State University College of Law
- Mar 14, 202518 min
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States, ex rel. Todd Heath - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
On February 21, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 9-0 opinion in Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States, ex rel. Todd Heath. Because the government “provided” (at a minimum) a “portion” of the money applied for by transferring more than $100 million from the Treasury into the fund, the E-Rate reimbursement requests in this case are "claims" under the False Claims Act. Please join us in discussing the decision and its future implications. Featuring: John Masslon, Counsel, Keller Postman LLC
- Mar 13, 202524 min
TikTok, Inc. v. Garland - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
On January 17, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 9-0 opinion in TikTok, Inc. v. Garland. The Court held that the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act's provisions challenged by the petitioners do not violate the First Amendment rights of those petitioners.Please join us in discussing the decision and its future implications.Featuring:Darpana Sheth Nunziata, Public Interest Litigator
- Mar 12, 202523 min
Lackey v. Stinnie - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
On February 25, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 7-2 opinion in Lackey v. Stinnie. The Court held that a party that receives a preliminary injunction but does not obtain a final judgment on the merits before a case becomes moot is not a "prevailing party" eligible for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988(b)Please join us in discussing the decision and its future implications.Featuring:William Maurer, Managing Attorney of the Washington Office, Institute for Justice
- Sep 4, 202416 min
SEC v. Jarkesy - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 6-3 opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy. The Court held that when the Securities and Exchange Commission seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial.Please join us in discussing the decision and its future implications.Featuring:Devin Watkins, Attorney, Competitive Enterprise Institute
- Sep 3, 202431 min
Murthy v. Missouri - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
On June 26, 2024, the Supreme Court issued their opinion in Murthy v. Missouri. Originally filed as Missouri v. Biden, this case concerns whether federal government officials violated five individuals’ freedom of speech by “coercing” or “significantly encouraging” social media companies to remove or demote particular content from their platforms.Experts discuss and react to this 6-3 ruling.Featuring: Moderator: Brent Skorup, Legal Fellow, Center for Constitutional Studies, Cato Insitute Speakers: Corbin K. Barthold, Internet Policy Counsel and Director of Appellate LitigationJosh Divine, Solicitor General, Missouri Attorney General's OfficeJenin Younes, Litigation Counsel, New Civil Liberties Alliance
Get SCOTUScast summaries in your inbox
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
You Might Also Like
Listeners also like.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
scotusstats.com
Supreme Court Tracker - SCOTUS News
Inception Point Ai
The FedSoc Films Podcast
The Federalist Society
Cases and Controversies
Bloomberg Law
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
Slate Podcasts
Advisory Opinions
The Dispatch
Courts | America Out Loud News
Courts | America Out Loud News
Strict Scrutiny
Strict Scrutiny
5-4
Prologue Projects
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oyez
Landmark Cases
C-SPAN
Touro Law Review Podcast
Touro Law Review
About SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from SCOTUScast in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's SCOTUScast daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of SCOTUScast as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the SCOTUScast podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official SCOTUScast product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by The Federalist Society.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts. Upgrade to Pro for 15, or Premium for 50. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
What topics does SCOTUScast cover?
SCOTUScast covers topics including News, Politics. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting SCOTUScast summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.