Free Daily Podcast Summary
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Daily Summaries Delivered
by Oyez
A case in which the Court held that an individual may not sue a government official in his individual capacity for damages for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).
Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- 1 weeks ago58 min
Guerrero v. Johnson
A case in which the Court will decide whether a prisoner’s claim based on a new constitutional rule counts as “previously unavailable”—which would allow the prisoner to file a second habeas petition—when the prisoner could have raised that claim in an earlier petition even if it would not have succeeded at that time.
- 1 weeks ago1h 4m
Maxwell v. Dinis
A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal prisoner can use a habeas corpus petition to challenge the government's calculation of time credits earned under the First Step Act when seeking early transfer to a halfway house or home confinement.
- 1 weeks ago55 min
Younge v. Fulton Judicial Circuit District Attorney's Office, Georgia
A case in which the Court will decide whether a defendant who files an answer without including an affirmative defense may still raise that defense as the basis for a summary judgment motion — without ever amending its answer — and whether that remains true even when the deadline to seek such an amendment has already passed under the scheduling order.
- 4 weeks ago1h 24m
Salazar v. Paramount Global
A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase “goods or services from a video tape service provider,” as used in the Video Privacy Protection Act’s definition of “consumer,” refers to all of a video tape service provider’s goods or services or only to its audiovisual goods or services.
- Oct 13, 20261h 54m
Beaird v. United States
A case in which the Court will decide whether Stinson v. United States still correctly states the rule for deference that courts must give the Commentary of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
- Oct 13, 20261h 54m
Beaird v. United States
A case in which the Court will decide whether Stinson v. United States still correctly states the rule for deference that courts must give the Commentary of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
- Oct 7, 20261h 15m
Department of the Air Force v. Prutehi Guahan
A case in which the Court will decide (1) when the federal government submits a permit application to continue disposing of hazardous waste, whether that submission count as a final, reviewable government decision under federal law; and (2) before submitting that permit application, whether the federal government must first conduct the broad environmental review that federal law generally requires—even though the hazardous waste permitting process already includes its own, more limited environmental review.
- Oct 6, 20261h 1m
Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee
A case in which the Court will decide whether a complaint alleging a fiduciary breach in ERISA underperformance cases must include allegations of a “meaningful benchmark” to survive the pleading stage.
Get U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments summaries in your inbox
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
You Might Also Like
Listeners also like.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Audio recordings of oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court, with detailed case summaries and navigable transcripts.
Audio Arguendo
Raw recordings of Supreme Court oral arguments and notable global cases, presented for public access.
The High Court Report
Clear, jargon-free analysis of Supreme Court decisions and oral arguments, explained by an experienced attorney.
Supreme Court Brief
A weekly breakdown of U.S. Supreme Court cases and their impact on law, business, and policy, featuring expert analysis and interviews.
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Reads and analyzes Supreme Court decision syllabi verbatim, focusing on the court's official summaries without commentary or hype.
Divided Argument
A podcast discussing the Supreme Court with analysis and commentary by hosts Will Baude and Dan Epps.
Bound By Oath by IJ
Explores the U.S. Constitution’s text and history through judicial oaths, legal scholarship, and landmark cases.
Votes & Verdicts
Bloomberg
Bloomberg Law
Legal analysis from prominent attorneys and scholars on current cases and news-shaping issues, hosted by June Grasso.
Is This Really Legal?
A legal expert breaks down current events and constitutional issues to clarify what’s actually allowed under U.S. law.
5-4
A progressive critique of the U.S. Supreme Court and the political forces behind its landmark decisions.
The Good Judge-ment Podcast
Two Georgia judges discuss legal issues and court practices for judicial education, with insights relevant to lawyers and the public.
About U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
A case in which the Court held that an individual may not sue a government official in his individual capacity for damages for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Oyez.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts, any in the catalog. Basic raises that to 15, Pro to 40 and Max to 100. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
How often does U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments release new episodes?
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments publishes daily. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
What topics does U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments cover?
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments covers topics including Government. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.