What a difference a month makes. Trial consultant Samantha Teal had not worked on a $14 million sexual assault verdict, $1 million employment verdict, $10 million employment pregnancy discrimination verdict, and $307 million verdict in a prisoner neglect case when this episode was recorded. A month later, hosts Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer play their conversation. With experience consulting on nearly 100 trials, Samantha unpacks lessons learned – including why the instinct to prejudge jurors by demographics or professions could backfire, how she frames her signature voir dire question on "taking responsibility,” and when it might be okay to tell jurors that you’re nervous.Learn More and Connect☑️ Samantha Teal | LinkedIn☑️ SMT Litigation Consulting on LinkedIn | Instagram☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode sponsored by Focus Graphics.Produced and Powered by LawPods
AI Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Daniel Rodriguez – This Farmworker's Son Seeds Million-Dollar Verdicts
Dirk Vandever – The “Jeff Bezos” Approach to Winning Conservative Jurors
Keith Mitnik – What Package Are You Delivering to Jurors?
Keith Bruno – The Jurors Seem to Like You? Get Over It
Free AI-powered recaps of Picking Justice and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.