Free Daily Podcast Summary
Nullius in Verba: Daily Summaries Delivered
by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens
Nullius in Verba is a podcast about science—what it is and what it could be. It is hosted by Smriti Mehta from UC Berkeley and Daniël Lakens from Eindhoven University of Technology.
Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- 3 weeks ago1h 9m
Episode 85: Duae Culturae
In today’s episode, we discuss the classic 1959 Rede Lecture by scientist and novelist C. P. Snow. We reflect on whether there is still a divide between the humanities and the sciences, how important it is to be educated in both, whether the humanities and the sciences care just as much about the truth, whether scientists need to know Shakespeare, and what the second law of thermodynamics is about. Enjoy! Snow, Charles Percy (2001) [1959]. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-45730-9. Pickering (1995) The Mangle of Practice. https://archive.org/details/mangleofpractice0000pick/page/n5/mode/2up Rutger Bregman: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutger_Bregman
- Sep 19, 202659 min
Episode 84: Codices de Moribus Scientificis - II
In this two-part episode, we examine scientific codes of conduct, using the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity as our primary example. We discuss why such codes are necessary, where their guiding principles come from, and how (and whether) they are enforced. We also discuss many of the standards of good research practice derived from said principles.
- Sep 4, 202649 min
Episode 83: Codices de Moribus Scientificis - I
In this two-part episode, we examine scientific codes of conduct, using the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity as our primary example. We discuss why such codes are necessary, where their guiding principles come from, and how (and whether) they are enforced.
- Aug 14, 20261h 15m
Episode 82: Scientia: Nova Aetas Aurea
In this episode, we will reflect on how governments should support science, from the 1945 policy report Science: The Endless Frontier by Vannevar Bush, and then move on to the recent policy document by the Trump Administration 'Science: A New Golden Age'. We reflect on what we like about the policy report and what we like less. Is the linear model from basic research to application indeed outdated? Are metascience units a good idea? And will AI accelerate and radically transform how we do science? Enjoy. Shownotes: Bush, Vannevar. (1945). Science The Endless Frontier. http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.212068 Bush, Vannevar. (1970). Pieces of the action. New York, Morrow. http://archive.org/details/piecesofaction00bush Science: A Golden Age https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Science-A-New-Golden-Age.pdf
- Jul 31, 20261h 7m
Episode 81: Analysis Multiversi
In this episode, we will discuss multiverse analysis–what it is, why we use it, and how we should use it. We also discuss many analyst projects, and Daniel's new preprint on multiverse analysis. Shownotes Auspurg, K. (2025). Robustness is better assessed with a few thoughtful models than with billions of regressions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(43), e2521917122. Chamberlin, T. C. (1890). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science, (366), 92–96. Dochtermann, N. A., & Jenkins, S. H. (2011). Developing multiple hypotheses in behavioral ecology. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(1), 37–45. Dreber, A., & Johannesson, M. (2025). The credibility gap: Evaluating and improving empirical research in the social sciences. Routledge. Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Department of Statistics, Columbia University, 348(1-17), 3. Knief, U., & Forstmeier, W. (2025). Are our 95% CIs only worth 45% confidence? bioRxiv, 2025-08. Lakens, D., Rasti, S., & Tunç, M. N. (2026). There is only one correct analysis. (Preprint) Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science, 146(3642), 347–353. Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Harvard University Press.
- Jul 17, 20261h 10m
Episode 80: Intelligentia Artificialis
After a short break due to busy calendars, we are back to discuss the role automation and artificial intelligence can play in science. Is AI evil, or does it just amplify the problems that were already present in science? Can automated AI driven checks help scientists to improve the way they work? If so, where are these tools helpful, and when? Enjoy. The Babbage quote is from Babbage in November 1839, recalling events in 1821; quoted in Harry Wilmot Buxton and Anthony Hyman (1988), Memoir of the Life and Labours of the Late Charles Babbage. Alfred Whitehead: An Introduction to Mathematics (1911) Blog about AI references: Evaluating Dr. Cuddy’s Claim that the Debunking of Power Posing is a Myth. https://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2026/05/evaluating-dr-cuddys-claim-that.html Metacheck: DeBruine L, Mesquida C, Werner J, Lakens D (2026). metacheck: Check Research Outputs for Best Practices. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20704754, R package version 0.1.0, https://scienceverse.org/metacheck Cummins, J., Clarke, B., Hussey, I., & Elson, M. (2026). RegCheck: A tool for structured comparisons between study registrations and papers (arXiv:2601.13330). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.13330
- Apr 19, 202647 min
Episode 79: Dissensio - II
In this episode, we continue our discussion of disagreement in science, shifting the conversation from why it matters to how to do it well. Shownotes Paul Graham. (2008). How to disagree. Rapoport's Rules. Cass Sunstien. The Rapoport Rules. Preregistration is redundant, at best. An Evidence-Based Critique of the Cass Review Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 74–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600681248 Neyman, J. (1961). Silver Jubilee of My Dispute With Fisher. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 3, 145–154.
- Apr 4, 20261h 1m
Episode 78: Dissensio - I
This is a two-part episode on the role of disagreement in science. In the first part, we discuss the "why," before moving on to the "how" in the next episode. Enjoy. Shownotes Dellsén, F., & Baghramian, M. (2021). Disagreement in science: Introduction to the special issue. Synthese, 198(Suppl 25), 6011-6021. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson. Seidel, M. (2021). Kuhn’s two accounts of rational disagreement in science: an interpretation and critique. Synthese, 198(25), 6023-6051. Shaw, J. (2021). Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy. Synthese, 198(25), 6053-6084.
Get Nullius in Verba summaries in your inbox
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
You Might Also Like
Listeners also like.
Invisibilia
Explores the invisible forces shaping human behavior through narrative and science.
COMPLEXITY
Santa Fe Institute
The World, the Universe and Us
Explores big scientific questions about life, consciousness, climate, and the cosmos with expert scientists and New Scientist journalists.
Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe
Two scientists explore diverse topics across the universe, from particles to ecosystems, with accessible and engaging explanations.
Inquiring Minds
Explores the intersection of science and society through critical thinking and in-depth analysis.
From First Principles
Breaks down major science stories weekly, explaining the mechanics behind physics, space, AI, and biotech developments.
From First Principles
Breaks down major science stories weekly, explaining the mechanics behind physics, space, AI, and biotech developments.
Science Magazine Podcast
Weekly episodes covering original scientific research, global science news, and expert commentary.
Forum Borealis
In-depth interviews with authors and thinkers on unconventional topics in history, science, philosophy, and politics.
Surprisingly Brilliant
Seeker
How to Be Wrong
New Books Network
Scope Conditions Podcast
A podcast showcasing cutting-edge research in comparative politics.
About Nullius in Verba
Nullius in Verba is a podcast about science—what it is and what it could be. It is hosted by Smriti Mehta from UC Berkeley and Daniël Lakens from Eindhoven University of Technology.
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from Nullius in Verba in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's Nullius in Verba daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of Nullius in Verba as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the Nullius in Verba podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official Nullius in Verba product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts, any in the catalog. Basic raises that to 15, Pro to 40 and Max to 100. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
How often does Nullius in Verba release new episodes?
Nullius in Verba publishes biweekly. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
What topics does Nullius in Verba cover?
Nullius in Verba covers topics including Science. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting Nullius in Verba summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.