
The Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act in a 49-50 cloture vote, well short of the 60 votes required. Democrats centered their opposition on ethics concerns surrounding President Trump's crypto businesses, while Republicans argued they had already incorporated 126 substantive Democratic requests. Three Republicans opposed advancement on substantive grounds, while Thom Tillis switched his vote for procedural reasons that preserve the possibility of reconsideration. Matt argues that Trump's crypto interests gave Democrats an obvious political opportunity, while also questioning provisions designed to protect banks from stablecoin competition. The failure leaves major questions unresolved for altcoins, exchanges, DeFi, tokenized assets and developers, even as Bitcoin already operates under a more established regulatory framework. Fairshake enters the midterms with more than $112 million available, but there is no evidence yet that it will simply abandon Democrats for Republicans. Matt's broader conclusion is that CLARITY's failure is a political and regulatory setback, not the end of crypto. The technology, investment and financial experimentation underlying the industry continue regardless of what happened in the Senate. Happy HODLing Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Sept 18: Bitcoin Pushes Back Toward $78K as Wall Street Moves Deeper Onchain

Sept 17: Bitcoin Holds Near $77K After the Fed Hike as Institutional Crypto Keeps Expanding

Sept 15: Bitcoin Slips Below $77K as the 10-Year Breaks 5% and CLARITY Faces Its Big Vote

Craig's Biggest Trade This Week Is Staying in Cash
Free AI-powered recaps of Daily Crypto News and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.