Forcing utilities to justify their distribution-system spending

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.volts.wtf/subscribeMinnesota regulators Sydnie Lieb and Pete Wyckoff on why utility distribution spending — now a third of capital budgets and the biggest driver of rising bills — escapes the scrutiny the rest of the grid faces, and how to fix that.00:00 - Intro: distribution spending as an unscrutinized black box04:27 - How distribution is regulated differently than generation and transmission09:18 - Why distribution matters now: an aging system and the build-more incentive14:22 - Contestable “mandatory” spending: undergrounding, DERMS software, capitalization22:12 - Reliability standards and the cost of chasing 100 percent28:56 - The MISO comparison: valuing a lost hour, and the scale of the numbers35:02 - Non-wires alternatives: batteries, the Xcel project, and modeling gaps40:25 - What regulators should require: AMI forecasts and beyond the prudence test47:16 - The speed objection: does more analysis slow things down?50:04 - Why spending caps and rate freezes are the wrong fix52:33 - Spending more anyway, and recent Minnesota PUC disappointments55:00 - Restructured markets: does the same logic apply?58:32 - The vision of a well-functioning process and scaling it nationally