
Free Daily Podcast Summary
by Kevin Barrett
Red-pill truths and interpretations "they" don't want you to know about.
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
Rumble link Bitchute linkIn today’s news…the bad news is that Trump’s potty mouth overflowed as he threatened to “beat the f*cking sh*t’ out of Iran.” The good news is that Trump appears to have defecated in his pants at Lindsey Graham’s funeral…which might conceivably render him slightly less full of sh*t.Below is a transcript of last night’s Press TV interview. Listen to the whole thing in the audio podcast file at the top of my Substack post, or watch the two-minute highlight video above.Press TV: Well, it’s 6 p.m. here in Tehran and time for the news review. Welcome. Now, let me give you a recap of what’s been happening and what we’re going to talk about. We have been watching Iran, what another Iran is saying, as long asU.S. aggression against Iran’s civil infrastructures Iran will retaliate. And that’s what Iran has done. And the continuation of that, IRGC hit U.S. Air Base and headquarters in Jordan. And now Mr. Trump is going mad and saying that I’m going to hit Iran hard again. Of course, it’s not the first time this has been going on. Iran is also asserting its control over the Strait of Hormuz and IRGC Navy, the Iranian Army. They are both asserting their control there. And almost every day they are stopping a number of ships that have been trying to cross the Strait without Iran’s authorization. And of course the same talks are ongoing between Iran and the two coastal states to come up with a certain mechanism for arrangements of transit. So this is what we are going to talk about. Allow me to introduce my guests. In our studio in Tehran, we have Khomeira Ahad. And also we have Kevin Barrett joining us from Saidia in Morocco. Okay, let’s begin with Tehran, if you allow me, Kevin, so that Khomeira will just bring us some information and give us some more details regarding the goings on recently. Khomeira, do you think this is going to further escalate? Or is it going to come down? Because, if you remember the way Mr. Trump usually puts it whenever he says he’s going to do something big time and then the next day or five minutes later he changes his mind, he said let’s turn to the negotiating table.Khomeira Ahad: No, but I think that it is going to escalate. And the things which we have been seeing in the last few months point to that, that there will be escalation again . We know that in the last 24 hours, the IRGC has pounded American bases in Jordan, and ballistic missiles have been fired. The IRGC has been quite clear in saying that as long as unlawful hostile actions are carried against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and as long as the threats continue against Iran, retaliation will follow. And that is what we saw in the last 24 hours. And now we are seeing again very inflammatory rhetoric fromTrump. He has said in the last couple of hours that he’s going to again hit Iran very badly. And that’s not something new, as you already mentioned. In the last few months, if not a year or two, we have been seeing Trump again and again issuing this type of inflammatory rhetoric. And Iran has said as long as this inflammatory rhetoric continues, these types of threats continue, the American side will face retaliation from Iran. As a result of these threats, we are also seeing an effect on the world markets. According to reports, the Brent oil prices have again risen. And if the escalation continues, then we are going to see a huge effect on the global markets.Press TV: Great. Okay. Turn to Morocco now. Kevin, good to have you with us. So how do you look at things? Where is this leading?Kevin Barrett: Well, people have remarked on the parallels between Trump’s repeated threats and then his equally delusional claims that he’s been negotiating with imaginary Iranians. “It is very close to an agreement.” He typically issues the threats usually towards the end of the week so that the weekend will come and they won’t disrupt the markets too much. And then he usually says he’s been negotiating with his imaginary Iranian friends and is close to a deal on Monday to try to calm the markets leading into the week. But this time he is ranting and raving with his bizarre extreme threats in the middle of the week. So who knows what that means? I don’t think that even Trump’s psychiatrist
Rumble link Bitchute linkLaurent Guyénot, author of From Yahweh to Zion, discusses his new book The Papal Curse…and its implications for understanding where the world is going and why.TranscriptKevin Barrett: Welcome to Truth Jihad Audio Visual. I’m Kevin Barrett doing the audio since 2006 and the visual since a little bit after that, unless you want to count my Hannity interview and stuff like that. Anyway, I’ve been looking for truth, 9/11 and otherwise, for going on 25 years. And one of the more important, noteworthy colleagues in that voyage has been Laurent Guyénot. He’s the author of From Yahweh to Zion, the only book that I was willing to spend a year and a half or so of my life translating, because it’s really important. And a lot of his other work is important too. So without further ado, welcome, Laurent. How are you?Laurent Guyénot: Thank you, Kevin, for having me. I’m fine, thank you. So, I’ve been joining you in the fight for truth only 10 years, well, about 12 years. So, you know, you’re my teacher in that field, in everything, actually.Kevin Barrett: Well, thank you. So, we’ve been together about halfway through the period since 9/11 and pretty much on the same page. With the “Israel mainly did it thesis,” which more and more people are starting to wake up to. You’re hearing whispers of that from people with tens of millions of audience members. If you add up Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and well, there have been a couple of others, I think, too. What’s his name? That famous podcaster guy? Laurent Guyénot: Nick Fuentes, maybe?Kevin Barrett: Yeah, him too.Laurent Guyénot: Actually, him more than Carlson and Candace Owens, about 9/11 at least. It seems to me, from what I’ve looked at, Carson is not really saying Israel did it. He’s just saying they might have had foreknowledge or he’s still at this stage. So that’s why we’re looking forward to the 25th anniversary to see if the Israel did it theory is moving forward. I hope so.Kevin Barrett: Well, yeah, Carlson is dropping a few nods and winks, I think. He’s just being very, very careful so as not to invite, you know, getting Charlie Kirked or something like that. But yeah, I think you were ahead of your time with that thesis. And the world is catching up to you. And so you have a couple of other very provocative historical theses as well. And that’s what we’re going to actually talk about today. Your book, The Papal Curse, has just come out. And it argues that the papacy, the institution of the Catholic Church, has really been more of a curse than a blessing for Christianity, for Europe, and for the world. Now, my many Catholic friends—and I probably have as many Catholic friends as any kind of group from another philosophy or religion outside of my own Sufi Muslim orientation—I have lots of Catholic friends, and most of them aren’t going to like this. But I think it’s a discussion worth having, and any book that you write is worth talking about. So let’s go for it. Let’s talk about The Papal Curse. So what got you started with this?Laurent Guyénot: Well, I think my research really, it’s a prolongation, a continuation of my research on Yahwism, you know, on Israel, what is the essence of Israel. And in my In my book already, From Yahweh to Zion, that it translated, I kind of opened up the discussion about the Jewish question being actually the other side of the Christian question. How Jewish power kind of conquered the West. It cannot be explained without understanding Christianity’s relationship to Judaism. That was my starting point. But then having some background in the Middle Ages—Kevin Barrett: You don’t look that old. (Just kidding.)Laurent Guyénot: Yeah. Well, you know, my mind, my soul may be quite old. I don’t know.Kevin Barrett: We’re about the same age,
Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News linkOn July 20, Yemen’s AnsurAllah government—the bravest and most principled in the Arab world—closed the Red Sea to Saudi, US, and Israeli shipping. They slammed Bab al-Madab shut exactly one week after the Saudis bombed Sanaa International Airport to prevent a flight from Tehran from landing. That flight was carrying AnsurAllah officials who had attended the momentous, massively-attended funeral for the Supreme Leader of Iran, Imam Ali Khamenei, the spiritual leader of tens of millions of people throughout the region and around the world.Memo to Trump: Murdering spiritual leaders revered by tens if not hundreds of millions of people is probably not a good idea.Mainstream media claimed that AnsurAllah’s retaliation on July 13, which targeted Abha International Airport in southwestern Saudi Arabia, “shattered a four-year truce.” But it was Saudi Arabia’s bombing Sanaa Airport, not Yemen’s retaliation, that “shattered the truce.”The Saudis claimed that it wasn’t they who had bombed the airport, it was their Riyadh-based puppet occupation regime. That collection of quislings is obviously illegitimate, a mere catspaw for the Saudis. But the oil-rich sheikhs of Riyadh have used their ill-gotten billions to purchase fake “international recognition” for their pathetic pseudo-Yemeni stooges. Despite that superficial veneer of “international recognition,” nobody was fooled by the Saudis’ diversionary blather.What’s more, that “four-year truce” was a smokescreen for the Saudis’ genocidal blockade of Yemen. Around half a million Yemenis have died, four million have been displaced from their homes, and millions of children have faced severe hunger and lack of medical care due to the Saudi war and blockade.By bombing Sanaa Airport, the Saudis (and their Epstein-class bosses) offered AnsurAllah a perfect opportunity to break that genocidal blockade and regain access to food and medicine. The Saudi bombing of Sanaa was an act of war. Yemen and its legitimate government, AnsurAllah, had every right to respond. And respond they did—not just bombing a Saudi airport, but by closing Bab al-Mandab, and with it the whole Red Sea, one week later. Their “blockade for a blockade” tit-for-tat will likely not only collapse the Saudi genocide of Yemen, but also trigger immense geopolitical repercussions.With the Red Sea closed, Saudi oil exports are being severely throttled. Iran had already closed the Strait of Hormuz, and with it the Persian Gulf, eliminating the main Saudi export route. The Saudis had responded by piping oil across the country to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, and from there to Asia through the Bab al-Mandab. That allowed the Saudis to continue exporting about half as much oil as their average before February 28. Now their Red Sea exports are also being choked off. The net result of the closure of Bab al-Madab will be a doubling of the pain imposed by Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, potentially creating “one crisis too many” for the global economy. Prior to the Red Sea closure, about 20% of the world’s oil supplies went through Hormuz. Due to various workarounds, the actual reduction to global oil supplies was less than 10%. Indeed, 7% is probably a good estimate. So now that AnsurAllah is taking another 7% off the market, the net shortfall is heading up to around 15%. This doubling of the oil-shortfall pain is happening just as the world’s emergency reserves are getting dangerously close to “tank bottom.” Due to the coming oil shock, which will exacerbate pre-existing structural vulnerabilities including the AI bubble and larger debt bubble, it seems highly likely that the global economy will suffer extremely severe shocks before the end of the year, for reasons discussed by Michael Hudson and Ron Unz.Yemen’s AnsurAllah leaders are not a timid bunch. Can you imagine any other government with the guts to put “damn the Jews” on their flag? (X link to video<
Rumble link Bitchute linkPress TV interviews Kevin Barrett, 11/22/26Press TV: Hegseth and top military officials appeared before the Senate Appropriations Committee to defend White House’s $87.6 billion emergency budget request. The War Secretary revealed that the Iran war has already cost the U.S. $37.5 billion, warning that troops training will be curtailed without immediate funding. Democratic lawmakers have sharply criticized the Trump administration for Hegseth’s failure, with some warning against another endless war with no clear outcome.Some lawmakers also shamed the Pentagon for seeking unlimited money for bombs while ordinary Americans struggle to feed their families.Video linkDr. Barrett, always a pleasure to serve you. Hope you’re safe and doing well out there in Morocco. Your thoughts? Just earlier this week, I should say there’s an Ipsis poll. I don’t know if you saw it. There’s an 68 percent, record high 68% disapproval of the war on Iran. It trumps Afghanistan at 65, Vietnam at 66, and Iraq at 67. I know there’s a standard percentage of deviation here, and they could all be one or two points up and down. But nevertheless, it ranks as supposedly, for the time being, the most unpopular war with American people in U.S. history since records were kept.Kevin Barrett: Yeah, that’s not surprising because it was the most unpopular war, at the beginning of any war, that the United States has ever begun. In fact, the difference then was even greater. At that time, the approval rating was as low as about a third of the American people. Normally at the beginning of a war, there’s a rally around the flag effect. So normally, a huge majority of Americans, for whatever reasons, brainwashing, I suppose, being the biggest one, tend to support their country and their leadership when the war begins. But this time, that didn’t happen.After 9/11, it was 90 percent approval of invading Afghanistan. And this time it was like 30% worth of weak, lukewarm approval. And it’s only been going down since then. So this is an incredibly unpopular war, as it should be. Trump ran for president in 2016 by criticizing his predecessors for getting involved and continuing in these forever wars, has found himself in the mother of all forever wars that’s going to result in the mother of all defeats, because now the mother of all surrenders, the MOU, is going to have to be redone in an even more unfavorable to the US and its Zionist masters way, and a more favorable to Iran way, than the original MOU. They’re going to have to actually follow it up front. Trump’s signature means nothing.So Trump has gotten his country into a real mess. Losing this war as badly as they’re losing it, and finishing it with a surrender as outrageous as the surrender that’s going to be coming up, is going to really be a big blow to the dwindling power and prestige of the U.S. empire at this critical time in history.Press TV: What’s wild at this point, Dr. Barrett, Donald Trump’s still selling the same pretext that we need to stop Iran’s ability to build a bomb. I mean, didn’t you do that with the June 12-day war last year? You bombed the heck out of three key nuclear facilities, basically with bunker bunkers. So God knows what the damage is, like layers and layers beneath the ground. And back then you said we put Iran’s nuclear program out of commission.Kevin Barrett: Well, if you look at some of the videos on social media of Hegseth being grilled by the congresspeople about this, you almost have to feel sorry for Hegseth. He’s in such a terrible position. They asked him about why he said that they had completely put all of Iran’s rockets and drones out of commission halfway through the second week of March. And so obviously, they’ve made all of these bombastic claims of victory that are the precise opposite of the truth, which is, again, a huge political liability.They could have gotten out of this. The American empire actually could do very well just through diplomacy in the region. And indeed, rather than bombing Iran and making it more likely that Iran at some point will conclude that it needs a nuclear weapon to ensure its own security as an existential issue against an existential threat... what they (the US) is doing is they’re trying to convince Iran that it might actually need a nuclear weapon, which Iran doesn’t want and is resistant to.So everything the US is doing is completely counterproductive. It’s all about protecting Israel, and all of this is making Israe
Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link (Or watch ad-free at the top of my Substack—a thank you to those who made this week’s Fundrazr a success.)Does schoolyard bullying make good foreign policy? Jewish-Zionist neocon fanatic Michael Ledeen thought so. Ledeen, who relocated to hell last year, is best remembered for “the Ledeen doctrine”:"Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small, crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business."Ledeen’s comparison between bullies beating up smaller children, and nations mass-murdering people from weaker nations, is revealing. Normal people hate bullies and oppose bullying. Normal people also hate wars of aggression, and are only willing to fight and die to defend their country, but not to attack or invade another nation.But people are also, in varying degrees, susceptible to manipulation by sadists and psychopaths. And that’s where Ledeen and the neocons come in. By cleverly manipulating words and images, with no regard for truth, they can make bullying sound cool, and wars of aggression a decennial duty.Bullies, despite being hated by all normal people, can get away with their despicable behavior when nobody has the courage to stand against them. A schoolyard sadist can torment a smaller child as long as his classmates look on passively. But when one of them intervenes, it gives courage to the others, and pretty soon the bully will be taken down.And sometimes the bully picks on the wrong guy. Trump got away with his crimes against Venezuela. He gets away with threatening Greenland and Canada. He’s gotten away with sending ICE goons after illegal immigrants and ordinary people alike. He gets away with endlessly spouting buffoonish, third-grade level verbal sadism on social media. He gets away with slapping countries around with absurd tariffs. He gets away with strong-arming FIFA to suspend its penalties against American soccer players. Sometimes it seems that the whole world is so shocked by Trump’s disgusting moronic psychopathy that it can’t react. But on February 28, goaded by his fellow bully Netanyahu, Trump picked on the wrong country. The Islamic Republic of Iran has been prepared to win this war throughout the past 25 years, and has gotten stronger with every passing year. It’s a nation that loathes tyrants and bullies. Iran’s majority religion, Shia Islam, makes a point of remembering and despising the tyrannical bully Yazid, who murdered the Prophet’s grandson Hussein on the plains of Karabala. By perfectly embodying the Yazid archetype, Trump has succeeded in uniting the Iranian nation, and increasingly the rest of the Shia and Islamic worlds—and with them, gradually, all of humanity—against the big, stupid, ever-more-vulnerable American bully, and the mean little Zionist psychopath who is goading him on.Trump’s ever-more-pathetic attempts to intimidate Iran into submission failed, decisively, months ago. On April 7, as an 8pm “open Hormuz or else” deadline approached, Trump tweeted: “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.”Iran held its nose and ignored him. Trump backed down, blustering about a two-week reprieve. Iran kept ignoring him and standing by its demands. Trump kept projectile-vomiting unhinged threats. Iran dodged the projectiles and continued ignoring him (and matching US attacks at every step on the escalation ladder.) On June 17, Trump accepted Iran’s demands by signing the MOU. It was an undisguised US surrender. But political pushback led by Zionists, and the inevitable buyer’s remorse, led Trump to re-ignite the war by violating virtually every single point of the MOU. Now we are back to unhinged threats, attacks on civilian infrastructure, and the only slightly postponed countdown-to-apocalypse, including the likelihood of mass starvation in the not-so-distant future.The likel
Rumble link Bitchute linkAbove: Ken Meyercord’s award-winning film “So-Called Holocaust Denial.”----Below: Kevin Barrett and Ken Meyercord discuss “So-Called Holocaust Denial”:Rumble link Bitchute linkKen Meyercord, who spent years as Washington, DC’s most controversial talk show host, writes:Inspired by a trip to the Sundance Film Festival in Utah last January, I’ve been submitting my magnus opus, So-called Holocaust Denial, to film festivals around the world. It’s won some awards.Lest you think this is some tremendous breakthrough in thwarting the censorship surrounding the Holocaust, let me tell you what I’ve learned about the film festival business: it’s a racket. There are hundreds of so-called festivals out there but most consist of no more than a website and a repository for submission fees. They don’t actually hold a festival, just announce the winners on their website while providing no opportunity for an audience to view the films. I’ve submitted my film to some 25 festivals and, despite winning at four (with 15 or so still to be heard from), I can’t say for certain if anyone has actually watched my film—not even a reviewer, much less an audience. There are legitimate festivals out there who host a real festival and show the winners to a live audience, but it’s hard to tell the legit from the fraudulent online. Still, I consider the $20-25 submission fee worth it if there is hope at least a reviewer or two will actually watch the film. (You can watch the film here).P.S. I’ve reached the limit of my financial resources ($500). If you think this is a worthy endeavor (despite the caveats above), I would welcome any financial help you are willing (and able) to offer (all contributions will remain anonymous). you can do so through my ZELLE account (kiaskfm@verizon.net), Note that I am not a non-profit (501c3) organization. If you prefer, you can make a tax-deductible contribution through The Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH.com)here.Interview TranscriptKevin Barrett: Welcome to Truth Jihad Audiovisual. I’m Kevin Barrett, bringing you interesting people doing good work, whether in written form or— sometimes—filmmakers. And that would be Ken Meyercord, an intrepid filmmaker and TV host out of Washington, D.C. who has, for quite some time, been putting heretical material on the D.C. airwaves. And he’s got a new film out. I’m not sure quite how new. It’s called So-Called Holocaust Denial. So, hey, Ken, welcome. How’s it going?Ken Meyercord: Hi. It is not very new. I did it in January.Kevin Barrett: …So-Called Holocaust Denial. That’s a provocative title. And we all know that there are atrocities. And there were World War II atrocities. This is what happened to Dresden. But that wasn’t the Germans that did that, was it?Ken Meyercord: No, they didn’t do it at all. The good guys did. This was their work. And I was mentioning to you earlier, I just discovered a documentary made by 2001. It was on the History Channel. I mean, it’s big time. But one of their episodes, there are about 15 of them, was called The Aftermath of the War. And they talked about the fact that a quarter of all German housing was destroyed by the end of the war, and the cities firebombed and nothing much left of them and whatnot, and how they were starving, millions of Germans, or a million at least, according to James Bacque. And that was in his book, Other Losses. And between the starvation and… the German POWs after the war spent the winter of 1945-46 out in the cold, digging foxholes for themselves. So a number of them died too in that winter. Anyway, this is a great book about all that. But the movie, and I should have got a clip up of it, The War in Color. It’s called that because they discovered a bunch of color photography tha
Video from Press TV Telegram Channel See also: Rumble link Bitchute link TruthJihad link It’s increasingly obvious that Donald Trump, who had severe psychological issues to begin with, is not getting any less crazy as he degenerates into senility. Putting a madman in charge, at the precise moment when the empire is about to be overtaken by its rivals, is either a bold stroke of genius, or the stupidest move ever…and I’m pretty sure I know which alternative is correct.Coincidentally, shortly after I gave this interview, Hua Bin posted “The ‘Mad King’ of the West.” In it he notes: “When a king’s erratic behavior crosses the line from a nuisance to an existential threat to the state’s survival, the ruling elite, the military, or the king’s own family sometimes step in to permanently remove him.” My comment:What to do with Mad King Trump?Gemini: “In Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory of the carnivalesque, the ending of carnival requires the symbolic execution, dethroning, or banishment of the mock king or ‘Lord of Misrule.’”I propose that Elon build a very silly looking rocket and launchpad on the White House lawn. Trump, wearing a fool’s cap, is strapped to the nosecone. The rocket is launched, with great fanfare, carrying the soon-to-be-asphyxiated Mad King as far away from Earth as possible.This ritual, livestreamed worldwide to an audience of billions, would symbolize not just the end of Trump’s misrule, but also that of the Mad Empire for which he fronts.If you have a better idea, be sure to post it in the comments below.-KBTranscript:It's the old definition of insanity to keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. And Trump is nothing if not insane, as well as a senile, certified narcissist. His psychiatric diagnosis actually would probably take up pretty much your whole program. What makes this even crazier, from the American perspective, is that signing this MOU, which was essentially an American surrender, got all kinds of political pushback. So it looks like the administration or the powers that be behind it are having sort of buyer’s remorse about their MOU. Now they’re going back into the same losing posture that they were in before they signed it—which was the whole reason they signed it in the first place! This kind of flailing around to no strategic point is typical behavior of Western governments, and in particular the Trump Administration, these days. But I think this is really an extreme case of just completely clueless strategic planning and decision-making. There's never been a case in history where bombing a country, bombing its civilians in particular, actually convinced the civilians to sue for peace. It's always been the exact opposite. And we saw this with World War II. Notoriously, the horrific fire bombings of German cities and the horrific nuclear bombings actually were not what forced that surrender. In other words, the historians are agreed that you cannot convince anybody to overthrow their government and sue for peace by bombing civilian targets. It just angers the civilians. And makes them work that much harder on behalf of resisting. And that’s anybody. That works with all countries. But in the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, we have the absolute last country on Earth that anybody should imagine that they can coerce by deliberately targeting their civilians by bombing water plants and power plants and bridges and things like that. The people of Iran are majority Shia Muslim who have internalized that interpretation of Islam's commandment of justice to say that the big example here was the martyrdom of Imam Hussein. And a big mistake was made then, when people didn't stand up for him, and we're not going to make that mistake again. And so martyring the leadership, martyring the schoolgirls of Minab, and then threatening to harm the civilians of Iran is not going to convince the people of Iran to back off or to become cowards. It’s the opposite. The more that Trump acts like a crazed, out-of-control bully, the more fierce the resistance and the stronger the resistance is. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
In an interview with Newsmax last night, US president Donald Trump seemingly endorsed the conspiracy theory that Lindsey Graham was killed when “a certain part of his body” exploded due to contact with a booby-trapped LEGO child android.Trump, alerted to the danger, will presumably guard his “certain body part” against potential attacks by Laura Loomer LEGO androids.Loomer (the real one, not the exploding LEGO replica) has been blaming Russia rather than Iran for causing Graham’s “certain body part” to explode. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Listeners also like.

The Kyle Kulinski Show
A progressive host analyzes U.S. politics, class issues, and media with sharp commentary and leftist critique.

The Tucker Carlson Show
A political commentary podcast offering opinionated analysis from a conservative perspective on current events and media narratives.

The Jimmy Dore Show
A progressive political comedian delivers impassioned commentary on current events and systemic corruption.

The Wright Report
A former CIA officer provides daily morning news updates and analysis on global events, drawing on intelligence experience to explain key developments.

Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
Political analysis and interviews challenging mainstream narratives and holding power to account.

Real America’s Voice
Conservative commentary and news analysis on politics, culture, and current events from a right-wing perspective.

The Benny Show
A conservative commentator provides independent news and cultural commentary on America's political and social battles.

The Bulwark Podcast
Tim Miller and guests offer political analysis and interviews focused on defending liberal democracy and challenging Trump-era conservatism.

The DSR Network
The DSR Network

The Truth of the Matter
Breaks down complex global policy issues through informed, balanced discussions without spin or sensationalism.

IHIP News
Two progressive podcasters in a red state deliver comedic, upbeat reactions to political news.
Bulwark Takes
Daily news analysis from a conservative perspective, featuring insights and commentary by Bulwark staff on current political events.
Red-pill truths and interpretations "they" don't want you to know about.
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Get key takeaways from Truth Jihad Radio in a 5-minute read.
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of Truth Jihad Radio as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Kevin Barrett.
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts. Upgrade to Pro for 15, or Premium for 50. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
Truth Jihad Radio publishes 2x weekly. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
Truth Jihad Radio covers topics including News, Religion & Spirituality, Politics, Spirituality, Islam. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.