
Are We Really Better at Empathy Than the Bots? What the Research Says About AI in Therapy AI in therapy, therapy chatbots, and AI empathy: what the latest research actually says, and what it means for your clinical work. Curt Widhalm, LMFT, and Katie Vernoy, LMFT close out AI month by setting the hot takes aside and looking at what the research actually says about AI in mental health. They walk through the Dartmouth Therabot randomized controlled trial, where an expert-built, safety-monitored therapy chatbot outperformed a waitlist control, and a Communications Psychology study in which third-party raters judged AI-generated responses as more compassionate than those of expert human crisis responders. The findings are uncomfortable, and that's the point. In short in-the-moment exchanges, AI empathy can read as warmer than a human's, which is exactly the kind of result that makes therapists defensive. Curt and Katie talk through what these studies do and do not show, why a quick hit of empathy is not the same as a real therapeutic relationship, and the safety risks of consumer-grade chatbots that can validate delusions or miss a crisis. This is a conversation about staying credible instead of fearful: getting literate about AI therapy tools, talking with clients honestly about where these tools help and where they are dangerous, and leaning into the clinical depth, presence, and human connection that AI cannot fake. In this episode, we discuss: - What the Therabot trial really shows about AI therapy chatbots: better than a waitlist, not better than a human therapist - Why third-party raters judged AI as more compassionate than expert crisis responders - The difference between in-the-moment empathy and the long-term therapeutic relationship - How sycophancy and "context pollution" can make AI empathy feel good while keeping clients stuck - The safety risks of consumer-grade chatbots, and the regulation starting to address them - How to talk with clients about AI in a way that makes you more credible, not less Timestamps: 00:15 - Welcome and the two traps therapists fall into with AI 06:24 - The Therabot trial: AI therapy chatbots vs. a waitlist control 09:14 - Do people rate AI as more empathetic than human responders? 12:56 - Sycophancy, context pollution, and deceptive empathy 19:40 - Safety, crisis risk, and the regulation that is coming 26:27 - What people actually want in a crisis moment 35:45 - Be credible, not fearful: talking with clients about AI 37:40 - Deliver what AI can't fake: presence and clinical depth 41:36 - Closing: be aggressively human Full show notes and transcript: mtsgpodcast.com Join the Modern Therapist Community Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/mtsgpodcast Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/therapyreimagined Modern Therapist's Survival Guide Creative Credits Voice Over by DW McCann: https://www.facebook.com/McCannDW/ Music by Crystal Grooms Mangano: https://groomsymusic.com/
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

How AI Tools for Therapists Are Built: Trust, Data Privacy, and Choosing What to Adopt - An Interview with Ian Knox and Megan Toomey of SimplePractice

When Clients Bring AI to Therapy: Working with ChatGPT, Sycophancy, and the New Third Wheel in the Room

Why AI Mental Health Chatbots Fail When It Matters Most: The Hidden Vulnerabilities Stress-Testing Reveals – An Interview with Shirali and Arul Nigam of Circuit Breaker Labs

AI Ethics Codes for Therapists: What CAMFT, APA, NASW, and AAMFT Now Require
Free AI-powered recaps of The Modern Therapist's Survival Guide with Curt Widhalm and Katie Vernoy and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.