
Sarah Burton, Ph.D. joins Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. to talk about some do's and don'ts of jury research in medical malpractice cases. Sarah's Don'ts: - Don't go into a focus group expecting to predict the verdict - the purpose of focus group research is to understand how jurors interpret the evidence and what does and does not resonate - Don't start your research with a mock trial - focus groups (exploratory research) should be the first step in jury research rather than mock trials which are confirmatory research projects - Don't argue or advocate in a focus group - the problem when not taking a neutral approach to the presentation is it invites presenter bias - Don't assume jurors understand what you are presenting - you must assess juror comprehension before diving into their feedback - Don't make assumptions about how witnesses will perform - testing each of your key witnesses with jurors in a focus group is critically important Sarah's Do's: - Do focus on the why behind the attitudes and perspectives the jurors are sharing - Do listen more than you talk - Do be balanced and neutral - Do video all witnesses at deposition to test in focus group jury research - Do test your case early and often - apply the scientific method Watch the video of this episode here: https://youtu.be/dT4Mh3RAXQ0
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

#327 - Hot Seat and Trial Technology

#326 - Expert Witness for Dental Malpractice Cases

#325 - The Current Litigation Landscape: A Defense Attorney's Perspective

#324 - The Best Approach for Counter-Anchoring - Part 2
Free AI-powered recaps of The Litigation Psychology Podcast and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.