
Can social media companies be held legally responsible for the harms caused by their users? Richard Epstein examines the surge of lawsuits targeting social media platforms, particularly claims tied to speech, adolescent harm, and platform design. Epstein explains why traditional tort law places responsibility on the individual wrongdoer rather than intermediaries, how Section 230 is meant to shield platforms from derivative liability, and why efforts to carve out “bad faith” or promotion-based exceptions risk collapsing those protections altogether. He also explores the high costs and perverse incentives of jury-driven liability, the limits of causation in complex social harms, and a deeper concern often overlooked: government pressure on platforms that threatens free speech more than platform misconduct itself.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

A Turning Point For Section 2: SCOTUS Reins in the Voting Rights Act

The Half-War

The Slippery Slope of Social Media Liability

Tax the Rich . . . Until They Leave: Mamdani and Rent Control
Free AI-powered recaps of The Libertarian and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.