
On today's podcast, Executive Editor Natalie Orpett speaks with Senior Editor Scott R. Anderson about what Congress can do to direct the president to end the war in Iran. Scott's recent article in Lawfare, “What Congressional Resolutions Mean for the War in Iran,” explained why a likely presidential veto of a War Powers Resolution is not the end of the story. The War Powers Resolution gives Congress other tools—including some procedural tricks—that could have a meaningful influence on ending the war. They talk about Scott's article, why he thinks a concurrent resolution is the best option, and how congressional action may be more than just political messaging—it could have real legal significance. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Lawfare Daily: For-Profit Cage-Fighting at the White House

Lawfare Daily: The Trials of the Trump Administration, June 12

Lawfare Archive: The Return of the Syrian Civil War

Lawfare Archive: David Clements, the Evangelist of Election Refusal, with Anna Bower and Ben Wittes
Free AI-powered recaps of The Lawfare Podcast: Patreon Edition and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.