Free Daily Podcast Summary
The Jeremy Boreing Show: Daily Summaries Delivered
by Boreing Media
America isn’t over, but plenty of people are eager to write its obituary. Jeremy Boreing isn’t one of them. On The Jeremy Boreing Show, the Daily Wire co-founder, filmmaker, and entrepreneur sits down with the builders and dreamers, the newsmakers and the troublemakers shaping the future of the country. Leave behind the politics of despair and reclaim your agency from those who would rule over you. The future belongs to those who build it.
Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- 5 days ago1h 43m
Colin Wright Convinced a $1.8 Billion Institution to Fix Science | Ep. 34
The peer review system that governs scientific publishing was built to be an immune system — a self-correcting mechanism to keep bad science from becoming policy. It isn't working. In fields captured by ideology, particularly gender medicine, the correction mechanism has been reversed: papers that confirm the approved narrative sail through, while letters to the editor challenging them are ghosted, buried in endless limbo, or sent back to the same reviewers who approved the original paper. Dissent doesn't get published. It disappears. And in the absence of peer-reviewed counter-evidence, judges, policymakers, and medical boards treat the silence as consensus. Colin Wright has been fighting this for eight years. He left academic biology rather than write DEI statements affirming things he knew to be false. He was canceled at peak cancel culture for publishing — in Quillette and the Wall Street Journal — a simple biological claim: there are exactly two sexes. He watched papers that would have been laughed out of any rigorous review process get cited by the American Academy of Pediatrics, referenced in federal court cases, and used to justify irreversible medical procedures on minors. And rather than opt out of the system or fight it from the outside, he built something new inside it. Colin and Theory and Society editor-in-chief Kevin McCaffrey announced a first-of-its-kind post-publication peer review system through Springer Nature — a $1.8 billion academic institution. The system lets anyone submit a formal peer review of any published paper, routes it through an editorial process that evaluates argument quality rather than ideological alignment, and includes a built-in right of reply. If the original authors respond within a month, both pieces publish simultaneously. If they don't, the criticism publishes anyway. The veto that has been silencing dissent is gone. Jeremy gets into: - How peer review works when it works — and the specific ways ideological capture has broken it in gender medicine and related fields - The pipeline from flawed academic paper to AMA guidelines to federal court precedent — and why the absence of published counter-evidence is used as evidence of consensus - The multivariate animal sex paper, the brine shrimp wedding, and other examples of ideologically captured research that passed peer review and are now being cited in policy - How Theory and Society's post-publication peer review system works, what makes it structurally different from existing letter-to-the-editor processes, and why the right-of-reply guarantee changes everything - Colin's one policy recommendation: tie federal research funding to journals that don't require positionality statements or ideological terminology — and why that alone could restructure the incentive system - Colin's personal biography: flunking out of community college, losing his academic career at peak cancel culture, moving back in with his parents to become a fitness influencer — and the series of setbacks that led to the most consequential work of his career - Why the X comparison holds: just as one free speech platform changed the speech policies of every other platform, one journal willing to publish dissent may be enough to force the rest of the system to reform Also referenced: Christina Buttons, James Lindsay, Gordon Guyatt, James Nuzzo, Claire Lehman (Quillette), Kevin McCaffrey (Theory and Society). 00:00 Introduction 01:00:03 Is the Peer Review System Compromised? 01:01:03 How Ideological Capture Breaks Science 01:02:25 When Politics Invades Hard Sciences 01:04:40 How Peer Review Actually Works 01:08:18 How the System Goes Wrong 01:12:14 From Published Papers to Real-World Policy 01:21:17 Colin's New Post-Publication Peer Review System 01:26:53 How the New System Prevents Author Veto 01:29:36 Criticisms of the New Journal 01:33:25 The For-Profit Problem in Academic Publishing 01:36:01 Is This Really "Peer" Review? 01:40:47 The Scale of the Problem 01:47:48 One Policy Change With the Broadest Impact 01:52:27 Did Peer Review Ever Actually Work? 01:55:04 The Craziest Papers Ever Published 01:59:06 Colin's Origin Story 02:07:51 Failure, Cancel Culture, and Finding Purpose 02:15:21 What Drives the Refusal to Compromise on Truth 02:19:37 The Betrayal of the Scientific Ideal 02:31:55 COVID, DEI Statements, and the Corruption of Science 02:35:11 What Colin Hopes His Legacy Will Be
- 6 days ago2h 43m
Iran, Massie, Karmelo Anthony and the Politics of Despair | Ep. 33
Congress just handed a conspiracy theory a credential it will never lose. On Monday, on the 59th anniversary of the USS Liberty attack, Thomas Massie — a lame-duck congressman with nothing left to lose — stood on the floor of the United States House of Representatives and entered an antisemitic conspiracy theory into the Congressional Record. The claim: that Israel deliberately murdered American sailors in 1967, and that the U.S. government covered it up. That claim has lived for decades in the fever swamps of fringe blogs and crackpot influencers. Now it lives in the Congressional Record forever. That same week: President Trump resumed strikes on Iran after an American Apache helicopter was downed, and already Alex Jones and others on the conspiratorial Right are suggesting its a false flag operation by Israel. And a jury in Collin County convicted Karmelo Anthony of murder — and the social feeds filled immediately leftists are demanding his release along racial lines, while Nick Fuentes is calling for whites to mirror that same racial solidarity. The left and the dissident right are not opposites. They are competing brands of the same product — despair, blame, and the conviction that the only way forward is to burn it down. The left packages it as systemic oppression. The dissident right packages it as stolen greatness. The destination is the same: a person who has surrendered his agency to whichever movement most convincingly tells him he was wronged. But Jeremy believes we can build a better future. Not as a naive refusal to see the problems — but as the conviction, grounded in faith, that your choices still matter, that building is still possible, and that the future belongs to those who build it. Tonight, Jeremy is joined by the team making that case from the inside. Jeremy gets into: --Why Massie's USS Liberty speech is more dangerous than its content — and what the venue tells you about where the dissident right is heading --The convergence of the left and the dissident right: same ideology, different packaging --Why Jeremy launched this show — not because he wanted a podcast, but because an object in motion is more generative than an object at rest --How Boreing Media thinks about AI, editorial standards, and building institutions that don't drift toward audience capture --What the conservative movement actually has to do in the next two years to avoid handing power back to the left Guests: Alyssa Cordova (Executive Producer, The Jeremy Boreing Show), Jon Lewis (President, Boreing Media), Joel Berry (Senior Producer, The Jeremy Boreing Show; former Managing Editor, The Babylon Bee) 00:00 Introduction – USS Liberty, Thomas Massey & the Dissident Right 02:16 Carmelo Anthony Verdict & the Left-Right Convergence 03:49 Jeremy's Story: Leaving The Daily Wire & Starting Over 06:41 Why Jeremy Launched This Show 08:01 The Conservative Movement in Crisis 09:15 Meet the Team: John Lewis, Joel Berry & Alyssa Cordova 17:03 What Makes the Daily Wire Different: A Culture of Winning 23:49 Mission Over Role: Rightly Ordering Your Priorities 28:29 Work as Worship: The Protestant Work Ethic & Calling 36:28 Parasocial Relationships – Good, Bad & the President Parallel 47:22 Every Job Has a Mission – Plumbers, Tombstone Sellers & Sandwich Makers 01:02:57 AI, Filmmaking & the Future of Media 01:09:46 Breaking Down the Team's Daily Reality 01:22:31 Audience Q&A: Where Does the Political Chaos End? 01:37:52 Audience Q&A: Husband, Wife & Competing Callings 02:02:57 Audience Q&A: Thoughts on AI Filmmaking 02:18:36 Audience Q&A: What Matters Most in Friendship 02:37:01 The Bent Key – Debunking a Fan Conspiracy Theory
- 1 weeks ago50 min
Tucker, Candace, and Massie Are Lying to You About the USS Liberty | Ep. 32
Today marks the fifty-ninth anniversary of the attack on the USS Liberty. Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Thomas Massie and their ilk have been pushing a conspiracy theory about what happened on June 8th, 1967 — and they’re lying to you about what really happened. This is Jeremy's definitive debunking of the USS Liberty conspiracy theory: what the evidence actually shows, why the false flag narrative doesn't survive scrutiny, and why the dissident Right is pushing lies about the tragic deaths of 34 American sailors. On June 8th, 1967, Israeli forces attacked the USS Liberty, a U.S. Navy intelligence ship operating in the eastern Mediterranean near the Sinai coast. Thirty-four Americans were killed. One hundred and seventy-one were wounded. Every official investigation that followed — the Navy Court of Inquiry, CIA analysis, the NSA's declassified intercepts, the Clark Clifford report, the Joint Chiefs review, and multiple congressional investigations — reached the same conclusion: the attack was a tragic case of mistaken identity. Friendly fire in the fog of war. That verdict has never been overturned. The USS Liberty conspiracy theory exists not because the evidence supports it, but because the evidence has been systematically misrepresented by people with an agenda. Jeremy gets into: the eight specific claims made by USS Liberty conspiracy theorists and why none of them hold up — the American flag argument, the NSA tapes, the "unmistakable ship" claim, the life raft machine-gunning allegation, the rescue plane recall, the Ward Boston affidavit, the 2003 Moorer Commission, and the cover-up theory; the Gish Gallop — the debate tactic of substituting volume of weak claims for the strength of any single argument, and how it drives every USS Liberty conspiracy conversation; the strategic context of June 1967 — Egypt, Syria, and Jordan massed on Israel's borders with the stated aim of annihilation, Soviet client states throughout the Arab world, and Lyndon Johnson's overriding fear of a great power confrontation with the USSR; how the USS Liberty came to be in the eastern Mediterranean and why it never received Navy orders to withdraw from the combat zone; Dr. Marvin Nowicki, the NSA's chief Hebrew linguist aboard an EC-121 spy plane recording Israeli communications in real time, and what the declassified NSA intercepts actually show; USS Liberty captain William McGonagle — Congressional Medal of Honor recipient — and his sworn contemporaneous testimony versus the survivor narratives that evolved over decades; Lloyd Painter's contradictory accounts and what the science of trauma memory tells us about eyewitness testimony from combat survivors; Admiral Thomas Moorer and the 2003 "Independent Commission of Inquiry" — no subpoena power, no access to classified material, funded by the USS Liberty Veterans Association, and why a private citizen's opinion is not the same as an official finding; the motive problem — why neither the "false flag to drag America into war" theory nor the "silence the NSA" theory survives contact with the actual strategic situation of June 1967; Iran's documented exploitation of the USS Liberty anniversary, including a coordinated campaign of over 2,000 Iranian accounts pushing antisemitic narratives at American audiences, documented by the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab; the Soviet-era origins of anti-Zionist propaganda and how those narratives migrated to Tucker Carlson's program, Candace Owens's platform, and Nick Fuentes; antisemitism as a conspiracy framework and why the USS Liberty has become one of the most respectable vehicles for it on the American right; and what Thomas Massie's planned House floor speech actually represents — and why a sitting congressman using American sailors' deaths to suggest Jewish power overrides American democracy is something the right needs to reckon with. Also referenced: Admiral Lawrence Geis, Admiral Kidd, Robert McNamara, Phil Turney, Dwight Porter, Russell David, Ward Boston, hull number GTR-5, Operation Cyanide, the State Department Foreign Relations historical volume, the USS Liberty Veterans Association, the Six-Day War, the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, Desert Storm friendly fire, the Battle of Antietam, the Battle of Germantown, Stonewall Jackson, and Pat Tillman. 0:00 The Attack on the USS Liberty 1:12 How a Tragedy Became a Weapon 2:27 What Is a Conspiracy Theory? 3:36 The Strategic Context of June 1967 6:40 How the Attack Actually Happened 8:42 Friendly Fire Is Not Rare 10:29 The 8 Claims — And Why They Fail 24:37 The Motive Problem 27:54 The Survivors Deserve the Truth 33:00 Where This Conspiracy Actually Came From 35:14 Why the Jewish People Are Always the Villain 41:26 What This Is Really About
- 1 weeks ago1h 39m
3 Waves of Left-Wing Violence in America — We're in the 3rd One Now | Ep. 31 with Noah Rothman
The Southern Poverty Law Center calls it a myth. Most American institutions act as if it doesn't exist. But Noah Rothman's case is that the United States is in the middle of its third major wave of left-wing political violence in the last century — and the polling, the assassinations, and the institutional response all tell the story of a society losing the social taboo that has historically held this kind of violence in check. Jeremy is joined by Noah Rothman — Senior Writer at National Review, columnist, and author of three books, including the brand-new Blood and Progress: A Century of Left-Wing Violence, alongside The Rise of the New Puritans and Unjust: Social Justice and the Unmaking of America. Noah is one of the few Trump-skeptical voices on the right who has continued to keep his eyes locked on the threat from the left even as conservative media has, in some quarters, drifted toward its own conspiracies and grievances. They get into: the three historical waves of left-wing violence in America — the anarchist and socialist violence of the 1910s and 1920s, the Marxian guerrilla movements of the late 1960s, '70s, and '80s, and the wave we are inside of right now; why the SPLC and most academic databases of "political violence" double-count prison fights and homeless-person epithets to manufacture a top-line that the right is uniquely violent; the rhetorical tactic Noah calls "the pregnant 'but'" — how Bernie Sanders, AOC, Elizabeth Warren, and Chris Murphy all condemned Brian Thompson's murder and then immediately appended a "but" justifying it; the Charlie Kirk assassination and the institutional left's largely respectful response versus the campus and online cheering, the Saturday Night Live applause for the name Luigi Mangione, and the conspiracy ecosystem on the dissident right (Candace Owens, Ian Carroll, and the Epstein-pedophile-class framings) that now exists in symmetry with it; the Network Contagion Research Institute polls showing 50% of self-identified left-of-center Americans say it is at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk, and 56% say the same about Donald Trump; the three publicly known attempts on Trump's life and Norah O'Donnell asking the President on CBS to respond to his would-be killer's manifesto; January 6 and the BLM 2020 riots as comparative case studies in mob violence, the blanket pardons issued by both Joe Biden and Donald Trump, and why blanket pardons are never a good idea; Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn — the Weather Underground revolutionaries who killed people, never went to prison, and got tenure at major universities — and Alexander Berkman, Howard Zinn, and the Marxian intellectual lineage that fed them; Helen Andrews's "feminization of society" thesis and whether the rise of female representation in hegemonic left-wing institutions tracks with the rise in intolerance and willingness to censor; the strange evolution by which Marxists became Pan-Arab Baathists became Islamists, the Red-Green Alliance, and Jason Burke's The Revolutionists as the international companion text; the Sarah Milgrom and Yaron Lischinsky shooting in Washington and the textbook Marxian writings of Elias Rodriguez; the Soviet-era "Zionology" academic project that invented most of the anti-Israel narratives that now circulate on college campuses (white settler colonialism, brown-South genocide, rape as a weapon of war); two "cellphone moments" America is failing to reckon with — COVID accountability, foreclosed when Trump became the 2024 nominee, and the Charlie Kirk assassination, foreclosed by the dissident right's choice to build conspiracies instead of confronting left-wing violence; Tucker Carlson, the Catholic integralists, and the rise of "rhetorical statue-toppling" on the right; and Noah's recommendations on what actually works — civic education, law-enforcement modeling, and the patient, unglamorous restoration of the social taboo around political violence. 01:02 Is America Living Through a Wave of Left-Wing Violence? 02:13 The SPLC Calls It a Myth 06:17 The Three Waves: Anarchists, Marxian Guerrillas, and Now 08:27 The Psychology of Political Violence 10:27 Luigi, Brian Thompson, and the Permission Structure 13:06 How the Databases Erase Left-Wing Violence 43:45 What Ended the Last Two Waves 47:15 Why Wealth and Education Make Us More Vulnerable 01:14:40 How the Right Is Blowing Its Own Moment on Charlie Kirk 01:33:47 What Can Actually Be Done
- 1 weeks ago40 min
The One Thing Gen Z Must Do to Save Civilization | Ep. 30
Two weeks ago, Thomas Massie lost his Kentucky primary. The night he conceded, Marjorie Taylor Greene posted that the Republican Party was "destroyed" and prayed for the “these creatures” — i.e. the boomers and her own party's voters — to be gone so the country could be "saved" by the young. A few weeks ago, Tucker Carlson called the boomers "the most loathsome, mediocre generation this country has ever produced." Burn down the old so we can be saved by the young is the most cynical lie in American politics today, and it's the same lie the left – Oprah Winfrey, Barack Obama, Margaret Mead, and Yuval Harari – has been selling for sixty years. This episode is Jeremy's case for why Gen Z is being sold a Marxist con dressed in right-wing sheep's clothing, and what it would actually look like to save civilization instead of burning it down. Jeremy gets into: the MTG "these creatures" post and what it really means; the $30 million primary Massie still lost; the blame-the-boomers movement and the numbers that disprove its central claims (Gen Z owns less than 10% of student debt, the homebuying gap is a 6-percentage-point spread not 66, millennial wealth tripled between 2019 and 2023); Tucker Carlson on the right and Jon Stewart on the left running the same Gen Z chase; the two kinds of historical progress — building on what came before versus the perpetual revolution that always ends in mass graves; why the American founders kept English common law and the French revolutionaries burned the calendar and sent 20,000 to the guillotine; Edmund Burke's "monster of monsters" and his partnership of the living, the dead, and the unborn; the Comanche as a case study in what happens to cultures that worship the young (they don't build civilizations); the sixty-year preaching tradition from Margaret Mead's Culture and Commitment through Oprah's "they just have to die" to Evan Sayet, Robert Fulghum, Eric Weinstein, and Yuval Harari telling kids not to rely on the adults; Abigail Schrier's Bad Therapy and the data on what telling Gen Z to ignore their parents has actually produced; the totalitarian playbook for breaking the parent-child bond, from Pavlik Morozov to the Hitler Youth to Mao's Cultural Revolution to Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge; the Fifth Commandment, Dennis Prager and the Apostle Paul on the only commandment that comes with a promise; what conservatism — per Roger Scruton and Russell Kirk — has actually conserved, including the world Gen Z woke up in; the boomers' real failures (no-fault divorce, abortion on demand, the COVID lockdowns) and the world-defining things they also built (Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Steve Wozniak, Tim Berners-Lee, the internet, the longest peace and prosperity in human history, Vietnam paid in 58,000 sons); the $84 trillion intergenerational wealth transfer coming over the next two decades; why the doom narrative about millennials was wrong and why the same story is being told about Gen Z now; and the closing call: don't be the doom generation, build the future, live long in the land. Also referenced: King George III, Robespierre, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Winston Churchill, and Donald Trump. 0:00 The MTG, Tucker, and Massie Moment That Sparked This Episode 2:10 The Most Cynical Pitch in American Politics 5:24 Tucker on the Right, Jon Stewart on the Left 6:41 The Two Kinds of Progress: Building vs. Burning It Down 10:00 American Founders vs. French Revolutionaries 13:03 The Comanche and What Happens to Cultures That Worship the Young 15:26 Sixty Years of "Don't Listen to Your Elders" — Mead, Oprah, Obama, Harari 20:44 The Totalitarian Playbook: Pavlik Morozov, Hitler Youth, Mao, Pol Pot 22:27 The Only Commandment That Comes With a Promise 25:15 What Has Conservatism Actually Conserved? The World. 29:13 The Boomers' Real Failures — and What They Built Despite Them 35:10 The Millennials Proved the Doom Story Wrong. Gen Z Can Too. #GenZ #HonorYourFathers #BurnItDown #JeremyBoreing #JBS #TuckerCarlson #MarjorieTaylorGreene #BarackObama #OprahWinfrey #ThomasMassie #Conservatism #Marxism #PerpetualRevolution #FifthCommandment #SaveCivilization
- 1 weeks ago2h 35m
James Talarico, ‘Christ is King,’ and the War for American Christians | Weds LIVE Ep. 29
Evangelicals voted 82-17 for Trump in 2024, made up 27% of the electorate, and provided the decisive single-bloc margin in the national vote — for the third consecutive election. Without them, the Left wins. But American evangelicalism is under attack from every direction. The Left is trying to co-opt it — Hillary Clinton in The Atlantic, Andy Beshear laundering leftism through Bible Belt language, and Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico telling Joe Rogan's audience that God supports abortion and is nonbinary. The dissident right's "Christ is King" movement is trying to fracture it from within. And decades of seeker-sensitive church culture have left millions of Christians biblically illiterate — easy targets for all of the above. Can traditional American evangelicalism survive? And can this essential voting bloc hold together? That's tonight's question. Joining Jeremy tonight: Allie Beth Stuckey — host of Relatable, New York Times bestselling author of Toxic Empathy, and the person Hillary Clinton spent six thousand words attacking by name. David Limbaugh — lawyer, nationally syndicated columnist, author of ten NYT bestsellers, five of which are on Christian apologetics, including Jesus on Trial. And Frank Turek — founder of CrossExamined.org, author of I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist — a man who came to evangelical Christianity from Catholicism through the power of evidence, and who's been carrying that evidence onto hostile college campuses for more than thirty years. 00:00 – James Talarico and the Weaponization of Christianity 10:30 – Should Christians Vote on Character or Policy? 18:47 – Trump, Evangelicals, and the Hypocrisy Charge 27:33 – Love vs. Approval: Has the Right Lost Its Witness? 44:11 – Catholics, Evangelicals, and Coalition Politics 1:04:42 – Why Young People Are Leaving Evangelicalism for Catholicism 1:17:05 – Sola Scriptura vs. the Magisterium 1:32:29 – Mormons, Muslims, and Who Can Be Saved 1:51:00 – The Demonic Battle After Charlie Kirk's Murder 2:21:10 – What Christians Owe This Moment: The Truth of the Gospel
- 2 weeks ago2h 5m
Tucker and Jon Stewart Are Running the Same Grift | Ep. 28 with Bridget Phetasy
The defining illness of new media isn't bias. It's audience capture — and a generation of hosts on both the left and the right have stopped trying to lead an audience and started trying to be picked by one. Bridget Phetasy has watched it happen, written about it, and shed followers for refusing to play along. Jeremy is joined by Bridget Phetasy — comedian, writer, Spectator columnist, and host of Walk-Ins Welcome and Dumpster Fire. She's one of the few people in this space willing to tell her own audience when they're wrong–and admit to them when’s she’s wrong–and she joins Jeremy for a conversation that ranges from the news of the moment to the deepest questions of how a person stays honest in public life. They get into: audience capture as the defining illness of new media; Bridget's argument that Jon Stewart sitting with Zohran Mamdani and Tucker Carlson sitting with Nick Fuentes are doing the exact same thing — chasing the in-vogue youth demographic on the left with Hasan Piker-style socialism and on the right with Candace Owens and Thomas Massie-aligned nationalism; the late-night ratings machine that built our chase-the-youth instinct from Letterman, Leno, Conan, Fallon, and Kimmel onward; why Don Henley, the Eagles, and the Beatles all stopped making the zeitgeist when they aged out, and why that's how it's supposed to work; the early COVID skeptics Liz Wheeler, Steve Deace, and Jesse Kelly versus the political class (Donald Trump included) who Jeremy believes should have been disqualified from government over the response; the Hollywood-patron model versus the conservative-media model, with Megyn Kelly as the rare network actually developing talent and Matt Walsh as the case study in what network leverage can do for an already-driven host; the 12-step inventory, the regret piece, motherhood, and the resentment culture; Bridget's faith arc from Sam Harris and the new atheists through Emmet Fox and the Lord's Prayer; and what she wants her daughter to remember her for. Also referenced: Ben Shapiro, Joe Rogan, Konstantin Kisin, Dallas Sonnier, Andrew Klavan, Alana Newhouse, Allie Beth Stuckey, Ben Sasse, Joel Berry, James Lindsay, Michael Young, Jordan Peterson, Alex Jones, Taylor Lorenz, and Erika Kirk. 1:01 How Audience Capture Is Eating New Media 8:52 The Analytics Trap and Selling Out Your Soul 15:25 "More MAGA Than MAGA" and Algorithmic Dementia 23:14 Networks, Solo Acts, and the Matt Walsh Lesson 34:24 Hollywood, Patrons, and Why Conservative Media Won't Make the Next Roseanne 42:48 Tucker, Jon Stewart, and the Gen Z Trap 52:49 Don Henley and the Burden of Staying Zeitgeisty 59:27 Postmodernism, Nick Fuentes Going Mainstream, and the Plague That Wasn't 1:10:41 Why Hasn’t Anyone Been Punished for COVID? 1:19:17 Sometimes the Trolls Are Right — Regret, Motherhood, and Resentment 1:50:28 Faith, Sobriety, and What Bridget Wants to Be Remembered For
- 2 weeks ago2h 0m
Massie, Candace, and the Coming Tsunami on the Right | Weds LIVE Ep. 27
Thomas Massie posted a poll on X in which over 85% of respondents said Israel is a greater threat to liberty in America than China, Russia, or Iran. Half the right is dismissing it as a bot artifact. The other half is treating it as gospel. Both are wrong — and tonight Jeremy unpacks why with three guests who study this exact machine for a living. Jeremy is joined by investigative journalist Lee Smith (The Plot Against the President, The China Matrix), political scientist Wilfred Reilly (Hate Crime Hoax), and investigative journalist, and founder of NPOV Ashley Rindsberg— three guys who, between them, have probably done more to dissect how false narratives actually get made, distributed, and believed in this country than anyone out there. They’ll get into the Massie poll and what representative samples actually show; the bot problem on X and what it means for public discourse and opinion; what Massie’s primary loss means for the next five elections; how and why a troubling number of people believe Candace Owens should be president; what a public that's stopped demanding evidence means for the future of the country; and more on tonight’s The Jeremy Boreing Show Wednesday LIVE. 00:00:02 – Thomas Massie's Loss & What It Reveals About Gen Z 00:02:33 – Foreign Propaganda & Why Americans Are Vulnerable 00:08:05 – Social Proof, Anonymous Influence & Manufactured Consent 00:16:56 – Russiagate, Domestic Propaganda & Broken Institutions 00:28:11 – The Manosphere, Loneliness & the Search for Meaning 00:38:20 – Gen Z, Religion & the Turn Away from American Christianity 00:48:39 – Anti-Semitism, Conspiracy Thinking & the Cult of Secret Knowledge 00:53:47 – Technology, Secularization & the Perfect Storm 01:00:17 – Building vs. Burning: How Do We Rebuild Institutions? 01:36:26 – The Death of Journalism & Conservative Media's Failures 01:47:45 – Final Question: One Thing You'd Change to Save the Country
About The Jeremy Boreing Show
America isn’t over, but plenty of people are eager to write its obituary. Jeremy Boreing isn’t one of them. On The Jeremy Boreing Show, the Daily Wire co-founder, filmmaker, and entrepreneur sits down with the builders and dreamers, the newsmakers and the troublemakers shaping the future of the country. Leave behind the politics of despair and reclaim your agency from those who would rule over you. The future belongs to those who build it.
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from The Jeremy Boreing Show in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's The Jeremy Boreing Show daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of The Jeremy Boreing Show as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the The Jeremy Boreing Show podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official The Jeremy Boreing Show product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Boreing Media.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts. Upgrade to Pro for 15, or Premium for 50. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
How often does The Jeremy Boreing Show release new episodes?
The Jeremy Boreing Show publishes every few days. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
What topics does The Jeremy Boreing Show cover?
Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting The Jeremy Boreing Show summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.