A new mishnah! One who makes a vow to bring an offering must do so in the Temple in Jerusalem (as compared to local personal offerings)... and also as compared to the replica of the Temple in Egypt: Beit Honio (or the Temple of Onias). And Honio was the descendent of Simon HaTzadik. [Who's Who: Simon HaTzadik] [What's What: The Temple of Onias] The historical context is essential here, in the era on the path to the downfall of the Second Temple... Note that the phrasing of one's vow will make the difference as to whether one could bring the offering in Beit Honio at all, though it obviously ought to be offered in Jerusalem. Plus, a baraita that delves into the question of where the Temple of Onias went wrong - namely, was it really a seat of idol worship? And who was "Honio"? Why did he agree to dress like a woman? And what was the state of the Jewish people in this era?
AI Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Hullin 2: Everyone Can Shecht, Except for Those Who Should Not
Menahot 110: Is Torah Study More Valuable Than Temple Sacrifice?
Menahot 108: Keeping Track of What You've Vowed to Sacrifice
Menahot 107: The 6 Horns for Collecting Donations
Free AI-powered recaps of Talking Talmud and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.