E27. Evaluating Hysterectomy for Non-neoplastic Indications: Reducing Unwarranted Variation (video)

In this episode of Talking O&G: a RANZCOG Podcast, host Conj A/Prof Tania Day speaks with A/Prof Natasha Frawley about hysterectomy for non-neoplastic indications. They draw on the results of A/Prof Frawley’s retrospective audit cohort study evaluating adherence to the Clinical Care Standard for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in regard to benign hysterectomy at her hospital.  Conj A/Prof Day and A/Prof Frawley explore aspects of the Clinical Care Standard, such as evaluating contributors to abnormal uterine bleeding, assessment for anaemia, access to quality pelvic ultrasound, and treatment options. They discuss when hysterectomy may be appropriate for non-malignant indications and advice for clinicians and health services that are implementing these standards locally.  🔗 Resources mentioned in this episode:  Retrospective Cohort Study of Low-Value Hysterectomy Before and After Publication of the National Heavy Bleeding Clinical Care Standard in Regional Victoria  Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Clinical Care Standard  NSW Government Agency for Clinical Innovation: Hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding  Atlas Focus Report: Heavy Menstrual Bleeding  Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire: assessing the influence of heavy menstrual bleeding on quality of life  📌 RANZCOG members can submit CPD at: https://shorturl.at/iq733   💬 If you found this episode valuable, please rate, review, subscribe, and share it with your colleagues.  RANZCOG acknowledges the need for more inclusive terminology for gender diversity. In this podcast we aim to use inclusive language, and any use of the term “women” should be interpreted to include all people requiring gynaecological and obstetric care.    The views expressed are those of the speakers and may not reflect the official position of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG).