
One person's loud and persistent certainty can become the board's decision. Not because everyone agrees, but because everyone else has grown tired of resisting and just want the meeting to move forward. Over time, that dynamic does more than produce a few bad decisions. It weakens the board's collective governance muscle and gives one member far more power than any individual board member should have. In this episode, I share a structured deliberation process designed to keep the "hijacking hyena" from taking over a consequential board discussion. The process uses position champions, strict time limits, neutral facilitation, anonymous force-ranking, and a clear final vote. You'll get a viable way to address a contentious decision without recreating the same power dynamic. You'll also learn how you as the executive director can help board leadership create a process in which every board member's voice is heard. This episode answers questions like: How do I deal with one board member dominating every discussion? How can my board better consider several competing options? What should I do when my board chair is dominating board meetings as the hijacking hyena? Links mentioned in this episode: Learn about Successful Nonprofits® board-development services Learn more about Successful Nonprofits® executive coaching
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Top 5 Mistakes Nonprofit Executive Directors Make with Marvin Webb

Can Your Employees Afford to Stay?

6 Clauses for your executive director contract

A Sabbatical Made My Nonprofit Stronger with Rebecca Stapel-Wax
Free AI-powered recaps of Successful Nonprofits Podcast and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.