Free Daily Podcast Summary
Set For Sentencing: Daily Summaries Delivered
by Doug Passon
Over a million people a year will face sentencing. For a client and their loved ones, it will be the most important day of their lives. Unlike at trial, there is virtually no limit to the kind of information a lawyer can credibly present to advocate for their client and demonstrate their humanity at sentencing. My passion is helping lawyers and clients craft their most compelling sentencing narratives. So, I was inspired to create this podcast drawing on my 25+ years of criminal defense experience, my passion for storytelling, my expertise in producing mitigation videos, and my years spent consulting and developing compelling case narratives that get real results. In Set for Sentencing, I present cutting edge resources, world-class experts, and the straight scoop on our often dysfunctional system -- all in service to one goal -- to bring more justice, more humanity, and more hope to the sentencing process.
Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- 3 weeks ago1h 11m
From Skeptic to True Believer: A Sentencing Lawyer's AI Confession
Two years ago I did a podcast on A/I with Patrick Barone and Randy Olson, teling them "hell no, I won't go." It made up facts and cases, it couldn't spell, and I was certain it could never touch the humanity at the heart of sentencing advocacy. But the machines got smarter and the stakes got bigger. Therefore, yours truly went from skeptic to true believer. I am still trying to learn this mind-blowingly powerful tool, and to that end, I needed to have Patrick back to help us figure out how to use this thing ethically, effectively, and without getting banished from the garden. Patrick Barone is a Michigan criminal defense attorney, a national speaker on DUI defense, psychodrama, and forensic science, and one of the sharpest voices in the defense bar on AI. We get into questions typical A/I discussions often miss: ⚖️ Is "check your work" really the whole ethics lesson? ⚖️ Are you risking your duty of competence if you refuse to learn AI? ⚖️ Is the paid version of your favorite chatbot confidential enough for client files? ⚖️ What happens when the body cam drafts the police report, and why your discovery demands need a rewrite today. ⚖️ Why your client's late-night chat with "the Law Offices of ChatGPT" can be catastrophic. ⚖️ Why nobody should ever use AI to write a sentencing letter. Then things get weird. For the first time in Set for Sentencing history, AI itself joins as a guest to grill Patrick, and I ask it the big one: is AI going to kill us all? The answer will send a chill down your spine. LINKS: Patrick's Substack: https://substack.com/@patrickbarone Patrick's NACDL articles: DOWNLOAD LINK ON SHOWNOTES: www.setforsentencing.com/podcast/AIrevisited Ep. 88, The Artificial Lawyer: The Artificial Lawyer: A Debate About the Usefulness of A/I in the Legal Arena - Set for Sentencing by Doug Passon Law
- Sep 21, 20261h 1m
Hot Pink Spotlight: The Clancy Mistrial Puts Women's Health on Trial (w/ Nellie King)
Over a million Americans face sentencing every year, and no case has put the question of criminal responsibility on trial like the Lindsay Clancy case. The country watched a Massachusetts jury weigh whether a mother in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis could be held criminally responsible for the unthinkable, and after 85 witnesses and 36 hours of deliberation, eleven jurors voted not guilty by reason of insanity. But one holdout refused to apply the law, forcing a mistrial and exposing everything the public gets wrong about the insanity defense: that it is easy, that it is common, that "not guilty" means walking free. Therefore, Doug sits down with nationally recognized trial lawyer Nellie King, past president of NACDL and a defender with multiple NGRI verdicts in double homicide cases, to break down what really happens after an insanity verdict, why these defenses are raised in less than 1% of felony cases, and why this trial shines a hot pink spotlight on how America fails women's mental health. In This Episode: 00:00 Cold open: A word from Kevin Reddington, Lindsay Clancy's trial lawyer; 01:37 Meet Nellie King: past NACDL president, insanity defense specialist 04:17 The Clancy case: 85 witnesses, 36 hours, 11 to 1, mistrial 06:26 What "not guilty by reason of insanity" actually means (hint: not freedom) 16:17 Why insanity defenses are so hard to win 20:33 The gold standard expert: Dr. Phil Resnick 25:23 M'Naghten, the ALI test, and the states with no defense at all 34:36 Wild beasts, lunatics, and 500 years of insanity law 38:40 The Hinckley backlash that gutted the defense 40:19 Autism and the criminal legal system: Is there an overlap with insanity defense? 47:08 When the mitigation story IS the defense 49:41 The real numbers: raised in less than 1% of cases 53:55 Predictions for the next chapter of the Lindsay Clancy case 56:26 The hot pink spotlight: women's health on trial 59:11 NACDL "Beyond the Diagnosis" seminar, Salt Lake City, Oct 7-10 LINKS: NELLIE KING WEBSITE: West Palm Beach, FL Criminal Defense Lawyers & Law Firm - Law Offices of Nellie L. King NACDL - 2026 Fall Meeting & Seminar (MENTAL HEALTH - BEYOND TEH DIAGNOSIS -- OCT 7-10)
- Aug 17, 202648 min
Luigi Mangione Pleads Guilty. Here's What Happens Next.
When someone pleads guilty to intentionally killing another person, with premeditation, in broad daylight, it's hard to imagine anything other than a life sentence. But that's not the end of the story for Luigi Mangione, because his federal guilty plea is a "no agreements" plea. That means no sentencing stipulations, no mandatory minimums, and full rights to appeal. Perhaps most important, the mitigation story is not yet fully told. All of this means there's still a chance he avoids going to prison for life. Doug Passon and Mark Allenbaugh break down the actual guideline math, the mitigation case nobody's seen yet, the disputed "insurance denied his claims" narrative, and — with a bottle of tequila on the line — their predictions for what Mangione's sentence and placement will actually look like. In this episode: 02:49 — Current events: Todd Blanche confirmed as Attorney General, 50–49, Trump in a catering truck, and Mark Kelly steps up his messaging; 18:20 — The Luigi Mangione guilty plea, extolling the virtues of "open pleas" 25:35 — The actual guideline math: offense level 43, the first-degree-murder cross-reference 31:12 — The terrorism enhancement question 37:41 — The only real hope: Section 3553 mitigation 41:20 — Predictions: Doug and Mark bet a bottle of tequila on the outcome Links: Doug Passon: https://www.dougpassonlaw.com Mark Allenbaugh: https://sentencingstats.com
- Aug 3, 202650 min
BOP 2026: Crumbling, Weaponized, but (Finally) Wired?
Prison isn't meant to be easy and being inside is punishment. If every incarcerated human has a fair designation process, safe infrastructure, and meaningful programming, then safety and rehabilitation happens. But in two stunning developments, two things are now unequivocally clear: the facilities are crumbling, and the designation process can now be weaponized by the DOJ. A quietly updated BOP policy now gives DOJ explicit authority to override its own classification system and place any inmate anywhere — a power first exposed by the Ghislaine Maxwell transfer. At the same time, the Bureau announced a wave of facility closures so poorly managed it tried to shut down a prison that doesn't exist, all while sitting on a $4 billion maintenance backlog and shrinking access to the programs that actually reduce sentences. In the one ray of hope, BOP announces that tablets are coming soon. This will increase programming, visitation and leisure opportunities for inmates. In this episode, Doug Passon sits down with sentencing expert Mark Allenbaugh and BOP insider Walt Pavlo (prisonology.com, Forbes) to break down all three developments. IN THIS EPISODE: • 03:00: BOP designation policy 5100.08 and the DOJ putting its thumb on the scale for good and for evil; • 05:06: The Ghislaine Maxwell transfer: from low-security sex offender unit to a camp; • 18:38: Whose job is it to fix BOP capacity? Congress and the U.S. Sentencing Commission both take the blame; • 22:04: Practice pointer: get prosecutors on record at sentencing about designation interference; • 30:07: BOP tries to close a facility that doesn't exist — and one that's been closed for years • 34:03: The $4 billion deferred maintenance backlog, explained • 44:09: The tablet rollout: Walt Pavlo's Forbes take on "one of the most important reforms in years" LINKS: prisonology.com Federal Bureau Of Prisons Rolling Out E-Tablets
- Jul 20, 202644 min
The Process is the Punishment: Hannah Dugan Sentencing Post-Mortem
Ideally, every sentence serves to promote respect for the law. But in an age of the most lawless DOJ in American history – respect for the law is a dead letter. The sentencing of Judge Hannah Dugan is the most recent example of a how a weaponized DOJ is built for retribution, not justice. Doug Passon and sentencing stats expert Mark Allenbaugh conduct one of their famous "sentencing post-mortems", dissecting every aspect of Judge Dugan's sentencing. She avoided a prison cell, but her life is forever changed. The question that should be hanging over every judge in the country right now: who's next to get "Hannah Duganed"? In This Episode: 02:39 – The recap: convicted of obstruction, acquitted of harboring, hit with a $5,000 fine; 04:11 – Why "no prison" doesn't mean the DOJ lost — the process was the punishment; 07:47 – Grading the sentencing memos; 08:18 – The government's fuzzy guideline math and the mysterious Interactive Data Analyzer 34:01 – The BOP designation bullet Judge Dugan dodged 38:01 – The Passon Slap!? (Move over Will Smith). LINK: Original Dugan Pod: For My Enemies, the Law - Set for Sentencing by Doug Passon Law
- Jul 5, 202651 min
The Fate of John Bolton: Trump Doesn't Just Pick Who's Prosecuted — Now He Picks Your Prison, Too
Ambassador John Bolton pled guilty last week to mishandling classified information, and the plea includes a stipulation that if he receives prison, the term is no more than five years. On paper, this agreement reads like a win. But the plea isn't the paper that matters most, because the same week Bolton signed his plea, Acting U.S. Attorney Todd Blanche quietly issued a policy formalizing something no DOJ has ever done: proclaimed express authority to override the Bureau of Prisons and personally decide where an inmate will serve their sentence. Therefore, the wall between prosecution and punishment is now officially obliterated. Trump doesn't just decide who gets charged. Now, through Todd Blanche, he decides where you rot. Only the sentencing judge has the power to save him from this possible fate, by imposing a non-custodial sentence. The only question now is -- will he do it? IN THIS EPISODE: Why Biden's DOJ had four years to prosecute Bolton and didn't; Compare and contrast Trumps (alleged) crimes and Bolton's; Grading Bolton's plea agreement; Introducing Todd Blanche's new BOP designation change notice; Why the order could result in "pay for play" like the pardon and clemency process; Connecting the order to Ghislaine Maxwell's camp placement; The one sentencing move that could shield a defendant from vindictive BOP placement; Reading Abbe Lowell's press release and Bolton's "service to country" framing – a good lesson in narrative structure LINK: RECENT CHANGE TO BOP PLACEMENT POLICY:
- Jun 22, 202658 min
Manifest Injustice: Hunter, Hemani, & Buh-Bye Blanche
🎙️ NEW EPISODE: The Supreme Court just moved the goalposts on federal sentencing — and the next AG fight starts now. If federal defendants could trust that pleading guilty meant a predictable outcome, then the system would actually function the way it's sold to them. ⚖️ But SCOTUS just complicated that bargain. In Hemani, the Court reined in prosecutions under the felon-drug-gun statute. In Hunter, it cracked open appeal waivers for the first time — ruling 8-1 that a waiver is unenforceable when it produces a "miscarriage of justice." Because for years, prosecutors have leaned on waivers as ironclad, and defense lawyers have had almost no recourse when judges get sentencing wrong after the deal is signed. Therefore this matters for every plea negotiation going forward — and it lands right as the fight over who runs DOJ heats up. Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer and current Acting AG, has his Senate confirmation hearing set for July 15-16. If you care about who's setting charging and sentencing policy nationwide, now's the moment to make some noise. 🔊 #FederalSentencing #SCOTUS #CriminalJustice #PleaBargain #SecondAmendment #AppealWaiver #ToddBlanche #DOJ #SentencingReform #SetForSentencing LINKS: Liz Oyer's Substack on Todd Blanche: It's Time for We the People to Take on Todd Blanche Set For Sentencing Podcasts on Hunter Biden: Ep. 57: "Diversion Perversion" https://youtu.be/cSo6Y-PF78s?si=GjXg8U3PcX4ZmSlM Ep. 64: Too Cute By Half: Why Hunter's Plea Went South: https://youtu.be/sWEzwKLQCoo?si=1Hl_oXIJoU9cgAh4 Ep. 92: (Livestream Bonus!) Hunter Biden Edition: https://www.youtube.com/live/B3VL-cJlXSo?si=Ga9WQ4N6h3clr3gb
- Jun 8, 20261h 15m
New Compassionate Release Cases: Is the Door to Freedom Shrinking?
With the First Step Act of 2018 came the great hope of expanded grounds and use of "Compassionate Release." Judges were offered the promise of wider discretion to give deserving clients a second look at sentencing. But, the Supreme Court just made compassionate release a whole lot harder to get, because in two back-to-back decisions — Fernandez and Rutherford — the Court slammed the door on two of the most frequently used grounds for eligibility. In this episode, Passon convenes two of the sharpest minds in federal sentencing — regular guest Mark Allenbaugh and returning star Prof. Doug Berman — for a deep-dive reaction. Together, we break down what each case actually holds, where the majority reasoning goes wrong, why the dissents matter, and — critically — what still works. Because even though it seems the door is shrinking--- it hasn't closed. If you litigate compassionate release, this episode is required listening! IN THIS EPISODE: History of compassionate release; Discussion of Fernandez; Advice for arguing around these two restrictive opinions; Discussion of Rutherford; How both opinions usurp the role of both Congress and the US Sentencing Commission; How two pending cases, Maxwell and Beaird, may impact future compassionate release cases LINKS: Sentencing Law and Policy – A new home for SL&P (Berman's Blog) A great substack where Prof. Berman frequently contributes: Sentencing Matters Substack | DAB | Substack On that note, here's a great SM Substack piece from today on this very issue: https://open.substack.com/pub/sentencing/p/textualism-in-name-policymaking-in?r=1f0z1k&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email Link to Judge Block's Book, A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It, on Amazon: https://a.co/d/07xJD1zs Drugs on the Docket, Season 3: Excited for start to Season Three of "Drugs on the Docket" podcast | Sentencing Law and Policy Set for Sentencing is heading to Substack! We have not officially launched, but by all means, subscribe for future awesomeness coming down the pike: https://substack.com/@dougpassonlaw
Get Set For Sentencing summaries in your inbox
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
You Might Also Like
Listeners also like.
Sentencing Practice Talk
Discusses federal sentencing guidelines, case law, and practical application for legal professionals.
Public Defenseless
A public defender examines flaws in the criminal legal system through interviews with attorneys, advocates, and experts.
Locked In with Ian Bick
Former inmates, law enforcement, and legal professionals share stories of hardship and resilience within the criminal justice system.
The Trial: USA
Analyzes major criminal trials through court transcripts, interviews with investigators and experts, and detailed courtroom evidence breakdowns.
Doing Justice
A former U.S. attorney examines high-stakes legal cases and the moral dilemmas behind prosecuting powerful figures.
Drop Dead Serious With Ashleigh Banfield
A veteran journalist explores true crime cases with a personal perspective and investigative depth.
Dateline: True Crime Weekly
Andrea Canning examines current true crime cases weekly with reporters, legal experts, and field updates.
Stay Tuned with Preet
A former U.S. attorney analyzes legal issues in the news and interviews experts on power, policy, and justice.
CNN Presents
Investigative audio stories from CNN journalists on wrongful convictions, political persuasion, and U.S. cultural and political landscapes.
Admissible: Shreds of Evidence
A reporter investigates a forensic analyst tied to 13 wrongful convictions and allegations of misconduct at a state crime lab.
The Prosecutors
Two prosecutors analyze famous cold case mysteries each week, offering insider perspectives on true crime stories.
MK True Crime
Covers high-profile trials, true crime cases, and legal analysis with expert hosts and insider perspectives.
About Set For Sentencing
Over a million people a year will face sentencing. For a client and their loved ones, it will be the most important day of their lives. Unlike at trial, there is virtually no limit to the kind of information a lawyer can credibly present to advocate for their client and demonstrate their humanity at sentencing. My passion is helping lawyers and clients craft their most compelling sentencing narratives. So, I was inspired to create this podcast drawing on my 25+ years of criminal defense experience, my passion for storytelling, my expertise in producing mitigation videos, and my years spent consulting and developing compelling case narratives that get real results. In Set for Sentencing, I present cutting edge resources, world-class experts, and the straight scoop on our often dysfunctional system -- all in service to one goal -- to bring more justice, more humanity, and more hope to the sentencing process.
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from Set For Sentencing in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's Set For Sentencing daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of Set For Sentencing as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the Set For Sentencing podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official Set For Sentencing product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Doug Passon.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts, any in the catalog. Basic raises that to 15, Pro to 40 and Max to 100. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
How often does Set For Sentencing release new episodes?
Set For Sentencing publishes biweekly. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
What topics does Set For Sentencing cover?
Set For Sentencing covers topics including Education, True Crime. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting Set For Sentencing summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.