In this episode we consider the recent case decided by the Queensland Court of Appeal of Springfree Trampoline v Forostenko [2024] QCA 255, which involved a claim brought in negligence and s138 of the Australian Consumer Law against Springfree Trampoline for a trampoline accident on the basis that it was alleged there were safety defects owing to defective warnings given about the trampoline's design features and risks of suffering foot injuries.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Listen to This Episode
Get summaries like this every morning.
Free AI-powered recaps of Res Ipsa Loquitur and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.