
In Episode 142, we tell you about a victory for free speech after a court rules Ontario can't ban billboards just because they criticize politicians and public health officials. Plus, a horrific Ontario incest case shows why the reasonable hypotheticals doctrine isn't so reasonable after all. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:R. v. D.C. #2, 2026 ONSC 3029 (CanLii)Katerberg v. Ontario (Ministry of Transportation), 2026 ONSC 3991 (CanLII)Judge says it would be 'cruel and unusual' to send Ontario man who sexually assaulted 12-year-old sister to jail (National Post)Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn, with help from Alexander Surgenor.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Episode 144: Alberta Health Services BANS journalist just doing his job. Plus, protest leader faces terror charges.

Episode 143: Freedom Convoy organizer GUILTY of intimidation, could face longer sentence

Episode 141: B.C. secretly negotiating to give away up to 11% of the province to tiny First Nation

Episode 140: Did Muskoka drag critic commit hate speech? Plus, HALF of criminal charges stayed or withdrawn.
Free AI-powered recaps of Not Reserving Judgment and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.