
Today's conversation is with Jeffrey Nesbit about his book 'Nature of Enclosure'. So much of our architectural education and practice is reliant on the idea of control. Take representation for example. Without being able to quantify information about a site, materials or even people, how can we be expected to make decisions about what we ultimately build. If you can't quantify it in a representation of some sort, how can you be expected to design with it. How can you be expected to make creative and informed choices? I'm confident in saying that's the prevailing opinion. If we play this forward, there's the assumption that if an architect or landscape architect knows enough to represent it in drawing, diagram or statistics, then we can also reasonably understand the implications of those decisions. But that simply isn't the case. Either because we willfully exclude information (representations are of course by nature a kind of filter) or because our understanding of the information at hand was inherently lacking without our knowing. In this edited book by Jeffrey Nesbit called 'Nature Enclosed<span class= "Normal
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

108 _ THE END w/ Thoughts For Tomorrow

107 _ Jeffrey Nesbit / Charles Waldheim_'Technical Lands'

106 _ Catherine Ingraham _ 'Architecture's Theory'

105 _ Christopher Schaberg _ 'Adventure'
Free AI-powered recaps of Night White Skies and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.