Music History Monday: An Indispensable Person

Indispensability The title of this blog &#8211; “An Indispensable Person” – might be considered controversial. That’s because any number of very smart people would argue that there is, in fact, so such thing as an “indispensable person.” &nbsp; According to both Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt: “There is no indispensable man.” Said President John F. Kennedy: “Nobody’s indispensable.” Observed the redoubtable Charles de Gaulle (1890-1970): “The graveyards are full of indispensable men.” And there we have it: there is a school of thought that states without equivocation that “No one, absolutely no one, no matter how anyone has painted someone’s existence or value, is indispensable.” It’s a school of thought that I do not attend.&nbsp; That’s because based on my reading of history, there are indeed certain individuals without whom certain positive historical ends could not have been achieved.&nbsp; Here are four obvious examples. James Thomas Flexner entitled his superb biography of George Washington The Indispensable Man (Plume, 1974; currently published by Back Bay Books).&nbsp; Flexner was correct in so titling his book,&nbsp; because George Washington (1732-1799) was, in fact, an indispensable person.&nbsp; Without his leadership and indomitable will, the American Revolution would have quickly unraveled and been lost.&nbsp; And without Washington, the American presidency and with it, the nascent American democracy, would very likely have devolved into autocracy, perhaps even monarchy.&nbsp; (This book should be required reading for a certain six members of our current not-terribly-Supreme Court, who need – desperately – to be reminded of what the Founders intended and what moral greatness look like.) We should all be loath to even consider what the United States would look like today if not for the indispensable moral guidance and eloquence of Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865).&nbsp; As for the twentieth century, the world as we know it would not exist, and the forces of darkness might very well have triumphed, without the indispensable Winston Churchill (1874-1965) and Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882-1945). &nbsp; (As for the overly politically and socially sensitive among us: yes, yes, I am aware that these are all white, Protestant men; one of them a slave owner [Washington]; one of them an imperialist [Churchill]; and three of them members of the wealthy, ruling class [Washington, Churchill, and Roosevelt].&nbsp; So what? Does that information in any way reduce their contributions to humanity?) <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="555" src="https://d3fr1q02b1tb0i.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/15063804/2-3-1024x555.jpg" alt="British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (left) and President Franklin D. Roosevelt together at the White House on May 24, 1943" class="wp-image-9514" style="width:350px" srcset="https://d3fr1q02b1tb0i.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/15063804/2-3-1024x555.jpg 1024w, https://d3fr1q02b1tb0i.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/15063804/2-3-300x163.jpg 300w, https://d3fr1q02b1tb0i.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/15063804/2-3-752x408.jpg 752w, https://d3fr1q02b1tb0i.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/15063804/2-3-600x325.jpg 600w, https://d3fr1q02b1tb0i.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/15