This Law Practice Podcast fireside chat with Alan Klevan, Jennifer Ellis, and Steve Embry discusses recent court responses to lawyers filing AI-hallucinated or fabricated citations, focusing on the Oregon appeals decision in Williams. The panel explains that the court emphasized Rule 3.3’s duty of candor to both the court and opposing counsel, criticizing the lawyer not only for including fabricated authorities but also for attempting a “quiet correction” without acknowledging the problem. Th...
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Listen to This Episode
More from Law Practice Today
Legal Dimensions of the Gaming Industry
In-House Counseling: The New Law Firm Resource
AI Hallucinations in Court The Sullivan & Cromwell Lesson
How AI Is Changing Legal Billing and Client Value
Get summaries like this every morning.
Free AI-powered recaps of Law Practice Today and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.