Prince Harry v the Daily Mail: has this judgment saved press freedom?
The judgment has been passed down in a case involving a number of high profile litigants (Prince Harry, Doreen Lawrence and Elton John among them) versus Associated Newspapers, publishers of the Daily Mail. Judge Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed the allegations of unlawful information gathering, in what is being heralded, by some, as a verdict that defends press freedom. For others, however, it will simply license further outrageous behaviour on behalf of private investigators and media organisations. To discuss this, the Law and Disorder team are joined by Charlie Moloney, legal commentator and co-author of McNae's Essential Law for Journalists, and get a dispatch from within the courtroom from Sian Harrison.Law and Disorder is a Podot podcast.Hosted by: Charlie Falconer, Helena Kennedy, Nicholas Mostyn.Executive Producer and editor: Nick Hilton.Associate Producers: Lulu Goad Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Listen to This Episode
More from Law and Disorder
Will the Lindsay Clancy case get closure?
Emergency Pod: Farage's Foreign Donation Fracas: Has He Broken the Law?
Emergency Pod: Burnham's Early Release Scheme Conundrum
Understaffed and Overcrowded Prisons: Where do we go from here?
Get summaries like this every morning.
Free AI-powered recaps of Law and Disorder and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.