
In this episode, Dr. Bryan Pilkington speaks with Dr. Giorgia Pozzi about the ethical and epistemological challenges that arise when AI systems and human clinicians disagree in medical decision-making. The central argument is that disagreement should not be treated as a problem that must always be resolved by automatically trusting either the AI or the physician. Instead, disagreement can be valuable because it can expose uncertainty, encourage critical thinking, and lead clinicians to consider options that neither party initially recognized.Guest:Dr. Giorgia PozziPostdoctoral Researcher, Delft University of TechnologyHost:Dr. Bryan PilkingtonProfessor of Bioethics, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Of Scapegoats & Monday Morning Quarterbacks: Art Caplan on Science, Politics and Dr. Anthony Fauci

Against AI Exceptionalism: Healthcare for the Common Good

First, Organize: Physicians, Public Health, and the Power of Collective Action

Beyond “Checkbox” Ethics: What Really Matters in Global Research
Free AI-powered recaps of Health Ethics Podcast and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.