
Japan just broke a major taboo, and Australia may be next. A serving defense minister is publicly questioning whether nuclear weapons, nuclear-powered submarines, and extended deterrence should still be off limits—and that shift opens up one of the most important security debates in the Indo-Pacific. Carl Rhodes and Christine Leah unpack why this matters far beyond Tokyo. If you care about Australia’s AUKUS path, the credibility of the US nuclear umbrella, or what happens when old taboos collide with a worsening security environment, this conversation goes straight to the heart of it. You’ll discover:Why Japan’s willingness to openly discuss nuclear options is a big dealHow Australia’s AUKUS decision skipped the public debate Japan is now forcingWhat extended deterrence means, and why some allies feel safer with more visible nuclear supportThe tension between non-proliferation ideals and geopolitical realityWhy conventional and nuclear deterrence can no longer be separatedHow precision strike, drones, and long-range missiles are changing the meaning of strategic depthwww.thinkdeterrence.com
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Nuclear Policy: What Could Go Wrong with Dr. Stephen Herzog

Is America’s Nuclear Strategy Ready for Russia and China? A Conversation with Frank Miller

110 Facilities Later, Is Australia Already Part of US War Plans?

Ukraine’s Resilience in War: Lessons for the Future with Dr. Viktoriya Fedorchak
Free AI-powered recaps of Deterrence Down Under and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.