
In this episode, Crane is joined by Julian Assele to discuss Max Horkheimer’s long-running critical engagement with contemporary Neo-Thomism, the history of Catholic thought, and the social content of theological controversies dating back to the early Christian church. Starting from Horkheimer’s 1930s short-form polemics on the church and fascism, the hosts turn to his extensive criticism of Neo-Thomism in “Conflicting Panaceas” from Eclipse of Reason (1947)—as well as the earlier version of the text, the unpublished “The Revival of Dogmatism” (1943)—and conclude with a critical look at the late Horkheimer’s neo-conservative instrumentalization of religion in “Theism and Atheism” (1963), posing the question: what might a “critical theory of religion” look like today?Texts:“On the Concept of God” [or: “Thoughts on Religion”] (1935): https://jamescrane.substack.com/p/collection-horkheimers-fragments“On Theodor Haecker’s Der Christ und die Geschichte [The Christian and History]” (1936): https://jamescrane.substack.com/p/collection-the-materialist-as-polemicist“The Revival of Dogmatism” (1943): https://jamescrane.substack.com/p/collection-society-and-reason-1944“Conflicting Panaceas,” in Eclipse of Reason (1947)“Theism and Atheism” (1963), in Critique of Instrumental Reason (1974)Follow Julian on Substack https://substack.com/@julesnotesIf you want to support the show donate to us on PatreonVisit our website for writing and updatesFollow our socials:TwitterBlueskyInstagram
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Episode 20: Inside the Manesar Labor Movement

Episode 19: Peter Damerow and the Ontogeny of Thinking

Episode 18: Rupture Theory (Ft. Cam West)

Episode 17: Who Paid The Riddler of Western Marxism? (Part 2)
Free AI-powered recaps of Critique of the Podcast Form and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.