Free Daily Podcast Summary
Critics at Large | The New Yorker: Daily Summaries Delivered
by The New Yorker
Critics at Large is a weekly culture podcast from The New Yorker. Every Thursday, the staff writers Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz discuss current obsessions, classic texts they’re revisiting with fresh eyes, and trends that are emerging across books, television, film, and more. The show runs the gamut of the arts and pop culture, with lively, surprising conversations about everything from Salman Rushdie to “The Real Housewives.” Through rigorous analysis and behind-the-scenes insights into The New Yorker’s reporting, the magazine’s critics help listeners make sense of our moment—and how we got here.
Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- Today52 min
“Club Kid” and the New Fatherhood
The protagonist of the new film “Club Kid” never meant to become a dad. Peter, played by Jordan Firstman, who also wrote and directed the film, is a gay party promoter whose years in the New York club scene are finally catching up with him. When his ten-year-old biological son unexpectedly comes into the picture, Peter is forced to reckon with his new role in life. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz consider how depictions of fatherhood in the culture have evolved over time. After the women’s-liberation movement, postwar Don Draper-esque patriarchs gave way to a cohort of lovable sitcom dunces, laying the groundwork for the ultimate satire of American fatherhood: Homer Simpson. Today, dads seem to be more pals than patriarchs. Since 1965, partnered American fathers have nearly quadrupled the time they spend with their kids, resulting in a host of new ideas about what a dad is and how to be a good one. Amid seismic cultural shifts, one thing remains unchanged: paternal figures loom large in our lives, and yet there’s no such thing as a perfect dad. “Once you’re a parent, the performance of the role . . . it’s like nobody can actually inhabit it,” Cunningham says. “You think of the father as the person who ruined you or the person who saves you. And of course, you’re always both.” Read, watch, and listen with the critics: “Club Kid” (2026) “Who’s the Boss” (1984-1992) “The Cosby Show” (1984-1992) “The Simpsons” (1989–) “Married... with Children” (1987-1997) “Little Women,” by Louisa May Alcott “Mad Men” (2007-2015) “The Dead Father,” by Donald Barthelme “Pride and Prejudice,” by Jane Austen “One Battle After Another” (2025) “Hamnet” (2025) “Sentimental Value” (2025) hellodimeji’s Instagram “They Want to Be Better Fathers, One Braid at a Time,” by Isabella Kwai (The New York Times) “Transcription,” by Ben Lerner “Men at Work,” by Luke Winkie (Slate) “A Great Leap Forward for American Fathers,” by Jessica Grose (The New York Times) New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts. Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker that explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
- 1 weeks ago45 min
The Cozy Conservatism of “The Gilded Age”
The HBO series “The Gilded Age,” created by the period-drama maestro Julian Fellowes, took a moment to find its audience. But several seasons in, the lush sets, immaculate costuming, and soapy plotlines have attracted a robust viewership, making it must-watch television. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz consider the show’s appeal and whether its focus on high-society dramas makes it, as some critics have said, insipid or trivial. In his effort to bring the titular period to life, Fellowes both dramatizes and sanitizes the social tensions of the day, particularly in the case of the ruthless capitalist George Russell, whom viewers have affectionately nicknamed Train Daddy. Why are we so ready to cozy up to these historical avatars, even as anger toward modern billionaires’ meddling seems at an all-time high? “This show creates an avenue for viewers who politically are really opposed to that to actually indulge in it,” Schwartz says. “This is the sneak attack of Julian Fellowes.” Read, watch, and listen with the critics: “The Gilded Age” (2022–) “The Age of Innocence” “The Custom of the Country” “OpenAI’s Hollywood Whisperer,” by Charlotte Klein (New York) New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts. Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker that explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
- 2 weeks ago48 min
Critics at Large Live: “I Need a Critic!”
On this episode of Critics at Large, recorded live at the twenty-seventh annual New Yorker Festival, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz bring their advice series to the stage for the first time. They advise on a range of topics, including films to introduce children to the magic of movies, art to rekindle a feminist spark, and whether trying to optimize one’s inner life can diminish the capacity for genuine taste. Read, watch, and listen with the critics: “Gangs of New York” (2002) “West Side Story” (1961) “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” (2000) “Casablanca” (1942) “Raiders of the Lost Ark” (1981) “Playtime” (1967) “Duck Soup” (1933) “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial” (1982) “Spirited Away” (2001) The music video for Michael Jackson’s “Remember the Time” The music video for Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” “War and Peace,” by Leo Tolstoy “Plays: The Seagull; Uncle Vanya; Three Sisters; The Cherry Orchard,” by Anton Chekov “The Dolphin Letters, 1970-1979,” by Elizabeth Hardwick and Robert Lowell “The Black Outside,” by Joy Priest “Pricks in the Tapestry,” by Jameson Fitzpatrick “The Morning of the Poem,” by James Schuyler “Mommie Dearest” (1981) Hole’s “Live Through This” “Women Talking,” by Miriam Toews “Women Talking” (2022) “How to Say Babylon: A Memoir,” by Safiya Sinclair “The Substance” (2024) “Big Swiss,” by Jen Beagin “Oreo,” by Fran Ross “Life Itself!,” by Elaine Dundy “Eureka Day,” by Jonathan Spector “Middlemarch,” by George Eliot “Pride and Prejudice,” by Jane Austen “Looking for Mr. Goodbar,” by Judith Rossner “The Vanishing Half,” by Brit Bennett “Show Me a Hero” (2015) “Ocean’s Eleven” (2001) “Heart of the Beast” (2026) New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts.Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker that explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
- 3 weeks ago53 min
“You Can See Everything” and the Nathan Fielder Effect
Nathan Fielder’s onscreen persona—flat, literal-minded, and seemingly baffled by ordinary social behavior—has made him one of our most distinctive cultural figures. On his Comedy Central series “Nathan for You,” his approach collided with the eagerness of ordinary people to be agreeable, and on the HBO series “The Rehearsal,” it became a kind of social science, as Fielder staged elaborate simulations of real life. Fielder’s latest project, “You Can See Everything,” a documentary he made with the director Lance Oppenheim, trains that deadpan gaze on Elizabeth Holmes, the disgraced founder of Theranos, who invited the filmmakers into her home in the weeks before she reported to prison for defrauding investors. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz discuss the film and the strange mirroring between its two central figures: Fielder, performing an unnerving bluntness, and Holmes, wide-eyed and doll-like, who seems to remember almost nothing and insists she did nothing wrong. The hosts also consider what the movie says about the documentary form itself, and whether it can, or should, get at the truth. And with “You Can See Everything” earning fifteen million dollars in its opening weekend, a remarkable figure for a documentary, they ask what it says about us as viewers that we’re so caught in Fielder’s web. Schwartz says it speaks to “our very human need to trust people while knowing that no one is really fundamentally trustworthy, but wanting everyone to be.” As she puts it, “We’re all kind of on trial here, too.” Read, watch, and listen with the critics: “You Can See Everything” (2026) “We Can Never Understand Elizabeth Holmes, or Nathan Fielder,” by Naomi Fry (The New Yorker) “Lance Oppenheim Is Going Places,” by Alex Barasch (New York) “Spoiler Alert: Keeping Movies Under Wraps,” by Richard Brody (The New Yorker) “Nathan For You” (2013-17) “The Rehearsal” (2022-) New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts. Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker that explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
- Oct 8, 202650 min
“The Social Reckoning” Shows How It All Went Wrong
In 2010, Time magazine’s Person of the Year was not a world leader or entertainment icon but Mark Zuckerberg, the twenty-six-year-old creator of Facebook. That same year, Zuckerberg got the Hollywood treatment in the bio-pic “The Social Network,” directed by David Fincher and written by Aaron Sorkin. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz revisit “The Social Network,” which put forward an origin story for the company, captivating audiences and becoming a cultural touchpoint in the process. They compare it to Sorkin’s new film, “The Social Reckoning,” which dramatizes whistle-blowing by the former Facebook employee Frances Haugen and the resulting bombshell investigation conducted by the Wall Street Journal in 2021. In the earlier film, Jesse Eisenberg played Zuckerberg as a lonely, ambitious genius—a stark contrast to Jeremy Strong’s portrayal, in “The Social Reckoning,” of a man who puts profits before people at every turn. At its best, the new film functions as its own form of whistle-blowing. “The best reason to watch ‘The Social Reckoning’ is that a lot of people still don't understand some of these things about this company,” Cunningham says. “I do wonder if a kind of news-giving or news-bringing, however belated . . . is a salutary effect of these portrayals.” Read, watch, and listen with the critics: “The Social Network” (2010) “The Social Reckoning” (2026) “The Facebook Files” (The Wall Street Journal) "Succession” (2018-23) “Aaron Sorkin Made a Movie About Her. She Just Hopes Mark Zuckerberg Watches.” by Seija Rankin (The Hollywood Reporter) "As Big Tech Takes Over Hollywood, the Picture Onscreen Gets Darker," by Alissa Wilkinson (The New York Times) “Silicon Valley” (2014-19) “Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism,” by Sarah Wynn-Williams “Don't Be Evil: Bad Bosses, Fake Promises, and My Escape from Big Tech,” by Claire Stapleton “Edward Snowden and the Rise of Whistle-Blower Culture,” by Jill Lepore (The New Yorker) “Data center opposition a rare issue uniting Americans across the political divide,” (60 Minutes) New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts. Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker that explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
- Oct 1, 202656 min
Tom Cruise-a-Palooza
Tom Cruise is often said to be the last of a dwindling breed: the true movie star. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz consider the performances that have earned him that designation. The hosts are joined by Tyler Foggatt, a senior editor at The New Yorker and a die-hard “Cruise-head,” who breaks down the chapters of the actor’s career. The early “heartthrob years,” marked by films like “Risky Business” and “The Color of Money,” established Cruise’s appeal onscreen and catapulted him into projects with respected directors such as Stanley Kubrick and Paul Thomas Anderson. Cruise’s affiliation with the Church of Scientology might have torpedoed the career of a different celebrity, but he remains irresistible to audiences, who have shown up at the box office throughout the past decade of his career—which has largely been defined by action flicks and jaw-dropping stuntwork. In “Digger,” the polarizing new film directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu, Cruise’s performance as a potbellied, aging oil baron is a rare departure from his usual fare. Might it signal another reinvention? “Cruise will probably default back to the formula that he knows works,” Foggatt says. “But maybe we'll get a couple ‘Digger’s between now and then.” Read, watch, and listen with the critics: “Digger” (2026) “Risky Business” (1983) “The Color of Money” (1986) “Cocktail” (1988) “Jerry Maguire” (1996) “Born on the Fourth of July” (1989) “Magnolia” (1999) “Valkyrie” (2008) The “Mission: Impossible” movies (1999-) “War of the Worlds” (2005) New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts. Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker that explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
- Sep 24, 202650 min
What Survival Stories Tell Us (and Should We Listen?)
On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz discuss the perennial appeal of survival stories. They trace the theme of man versus nature from early novels like Daniel Defoe’s “Robinson Crusoe” to new releases like “Heart of the Beast,” in which Brad Pitt plays a grizzled veteran traversing the Alaskan wilderness with a canine companion. Survivalist themes are common in reality franchises like “Survivor,” now in its fifty-first season, and the History Channel show “Alone.” But a new offering from Channel 4, “Apocalypse,” takes the format in a darker direction: contestants profess their fears about societal collapse as they compete for food and shelter on an abandoned military base. As anxiety rises about the climate crisis and the potential for an A.I. takeover, the question of survival seems more pressing than ever—and yet these tales of rugged individualism can seem out of step with the times. “They don’t really describe our condition,” Cunningham says. “Unless you are in fact marooned somewhere, there are other people. It’s harder to dramatize surviving together than it is surviving alone.” Read, watch, and listen with the critics: “Heart of the Beast” (2026) “A Marriage at Sea: A True Story of Love, Obsession, and Shipwreck,” by Sophie Elmhirst “All is Lost” (2013) “Hatchet,” by Gary Paulsen “My Side of the Mountain,” by Jean Craighead George “Island of the Blue Dolphins,” by Scott O'Dell “Cast Away” (2000) “Rescue Dawn” (2006) “The Ecstatic Truth,” by Daniel Zalewski (The New Yorker) “The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding,” by Ian Watt “The Revenant” (2015) “Little House in the Big Woods,” by Laura Ingalls Wilder “Alone” (2015-) “Survivor” (2000-) “Apocalypse” (2026) “Tuesday, and After” (The New Yorker) New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts.Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker that explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
- Sep 20, 202656 min
Introducing: “The Journey,” from In the Dark
“The Journey,” a five-part audio investigation by Ava Kofman, unravels the mystery of how Guojun Xuan and Silvia Zhang, a wealthy Los Angeles couple, obtained dozens of children through nearly as many surrogates—and exposes a scandal that threatens to undermine the entire surrogacy industry. In Episode 1, “Gifts,” a woman in Texas agrees to carry a child for the couple. She thinks she’s helping a family in need. Then she becomes a whistle-blower. In the Dark is an acclaimed investigative-journalism podcast that launched in 2016. Its third season won the 2025 Pulitzer Prize for audio. To keep listening to “The Journey,” search for In the Dark wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get Critics at Large | The New Yorker summaries in your inbox
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
You Might Also Like
Listeners also like.
The Book Review
Top authors and critics discuss the week’s most notable books and literary news with The New York Times Book Review.
The New Society | culture from the New Statesman
A weekly exploration of culture, life, and society through interviews and reviews, examining how cultural forces shape the world we live in.
Culture Gabfest
Critics debate the week's cultural offerings, from highbrow to pop.
Popcast
A weekly discussion on pop culture featuring interviews and analysis from New York Times critics Jon Caramanica and Joe Coscarelli.
The New Yorker Comment
A weekly reading of The New Yorker's "Comment" essay.
The New Yorker Radio Hour
Profiles, storytelling, and insightful conversations are explored in episodes hosted by David Remnick.
The Political Scene | The New Yorker
Reporting and analysis on pressing political issues from The New Yorker’s writers and editors, with weekly discussions on current events and American politics.
The New Yorker: Fiction
A monthly reading and conversation with The New Yorker’s fiction editor Deborah Treisman.
Intelligence Squared: Arts & Culture
Explores pivotal artistic and cultural movements through conversations with leading writers, artists, and thinkers.
Prose Society with Eli Rallo
A weekly podcast blending literary analysis and pop culture conversation for fans of classic novels and reality TV alike.
Matter of Opinion
New York Times Opinion
The Editors
Political analysis and commentary from National Review editors on current events, policy, and American conservatism.
About Critics at Large | The New Yorker
Critics at Large is a weekly culture podcast from The New Yorker. Every Thursday, the staff writers Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz discuss current obsessions, classic texts they’re revisiting with fresh eyes, and trends that are emerging across books, television, film, and more. The show runs the gamut of the arts and pop culture, with lively, surprising conversations about everything from Salman Rushdie to “The Real Housewives.” Through rigorous analysis and behind-the-scenes insights into The New Yorker’s reporting, the magazine’s critics help listeners make sense of our moment—and how we got here.
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from Critics at Large | The New Yorker in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's Critics at Large | The New Yorker daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of Critics at Large | The New Yorker as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the Critics at Large | The New Yorker podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official Critics at Large | The New Yorker product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by The New Yorker.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts, any in the catalog. Basic raises that to 15, Pro to 40 and Max to 100. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
How often does Critics at Large | The New Yorker release new episodes?
Critics at Large | The New Yorker publishes weekly. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
What topics does Critics at Large | The New Yorker cover?
Critics at Large | The New Yorker covers topics including Culture, Society & Culture. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting Critics at Large | The New Yorker summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.