CI
Counter-Errorism in Diving: Applying Human Factors to Diving

SH273: What story gets told? What words are used? Who gets to the tell the multiple stories?

April 25, 2026·9 min
Episode Description from the Publisher

This episode looks at two very different ways of telling the same tragic story — the death of a 12-year-old girl during a scuba training dive in Texas — and why the way we tell these stories matters for real safety. The first version focuses on blame, emotion, and individual failure, which feels powerful but pushes people toward anger instead of learning. The second version looks at how the whole system shaped what happened, including training pressure, poor visibility, equipment choices, fatigue, class structure, and missing safety checks. Instead of asking “who failed,” it asks how normal practices, routines, and decisions slowly combined to create dangerous conditions. The key message is simple: real prevention doesn’t come from blaming people, it comes from understanding how systems work in everyday conditions — and changing those systems so tragedies like this are far less likely to happen again.Original blog: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/what-story-gets-told-what-words-are-usedLinks: Why hurting prevents changeWhat is the purpose of an investigationSharing stories: https://youtu.be/DRXqeQvRFK0Linnea Mills case: https://youtu.be/lu4tc8gtNioTags: English| Learning, Incidents & Just Culture

AI Summary coming soon

Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.

Get Free Summaries →

Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Listen to This Episode

Get summaries like this every morning.

Free AI-powered recaps of Counter-Errorism in Diving: Applying Human Factors to Diving and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.

Get Free Summaries →

Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.