
Motions for summary judgment can serve multiple purposes short of a straightforward, embattled "win." In fact, the most favorable outcome possible with a motion for summary judgment is to end the case with no contest, due to an opponent's prudent election to stand down. This means that the drafter of a motion for summary judgment needs to keep in mind that the intended audience is not only the judge who would issue a ruling if the motion is contested, but perhaps even more importantly, the target audience should be the receiving attorney who has to decide whether or not to oppose in the first place. Marshall J. Shepardson of Fraser Watson Croutch LLP presents a "once-around-the-track" survey of each stage of the MSJ process, focused on the theory and mechanics of crafting a motion while keeping in mind both important audiences: the presiding judge, who may ultimately decide the motion, as well as the opposing attorney, who may decide just to let this one go. Audio versions of Beverly Hills Bar Association programs are eligible for Self-Study CLE credit in California. Visit www.bhba.org/podcasts for more information.
Podzilla Summary coming soon
Sign up to get notified when the full AI-powered summary is ready.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.

Beyond Technical Excellence: Building the Leadership Reputation That Advances Your Career

Real Property Decisions in Trust and Estate Administration

Medical-Legal Quality Assurance Checklist - They’re Not Just for Physicians: Understanding the Impact of Labor Code Sec. 4062.4.

CCP §664 6 Changes Affecting Settlement of Real Estate Disputes, With Emphasis on Probate and Family
Free AI-powered recaps of CLEs You Actually Want to Hear and your other favorite podcasts, delivered to your inbox.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.