Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- Today1 min
ASIA LEADS THE US
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.russell-clark.comI did a degree in Asian studies and Economics at University, and when I graduated in 2000, I knew that China was going to be the next big thing. In 2002, I tried to get a job in Asia, but no one was hiring, so I took a job as an emerging market analyst in London, which was a good second option. When I got to London, I was shocked at how little people knew about Asia. It was an afterthought at best. If you have been reading this substack, you should be aware I think JGBs lead US Treasuries. One of the questions people almost never ask, is why is Japan a lead on the US?
- Yesterday7 min
HOW TO SURVIVE A BEAR MARKET
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.russell-clark.comI came of age in the 1990s. I went to High School in Japan in 1991, which was the top of the their bull market. I went to Hong Kong in 1998 during the Asian Financial Crisis, I got my first job in finance in 2000 at the top of the dot com bubble, I got my first fund in 2006 just as the housing crisis was kicking off. In all of these crisis at least 50% of the people I worked with lost their jobs. I made finding and avoiding bear markets my number one focus. Of course just as I thought I worked how to do this, the US began the most epic bull market of all time. Probably the best graph to show this is the performance of the S&P 500 relative to bonds.Or another way to put this is equities kept getting more expensive even as bonds got cheaper.I had originally put this divergence down to governments choosing “pro-labour” policies. But recent price action is making me think this could have also been driven by the AI boom. Now here is a wealth warning. Back in 2007, I ran an emerging market fund, which was shooting the lights out. I knew the US had some housing market weakness, and at the time I thought that would mean the Fed would cut rates, dollar would weaken, and emerging market would be fine - the so called “divergence trade”. I realised in late 2007, this was incredibly stupid, and cut the book just before emerging markets went cliff diving. When the US has a problem, everyone has a problem.After that, I was able to pick out the steel and iron ore bear market, the shale oil bear market, and the Chinese tech bear market, and I guess the more recent bear market in bonds. But the underlying trend in stocks has been up. Unless you have been foolish enough to invest in Chinese stocks, most people have not seen a bear market.Here are my basic guidelines to surviving a bear market:
- Yesterday3 min
WAS THE JGB MARKET JUST FOLLOWING THE AI BOOM?
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.russell-clark.comI have huge love and admiration for JGBs, and by extension, the JGB investors. Basically, I never argue with JGBs. If they say inflation, I think inflation. If they say deflation, then I think deflation. I made a lot of money in Irish bonds during the Eurocrisis, but I am very proud of my purchase of 30 Year JGBS in 2015 at 1.5%, and then selling them at 0.10% a few months later.When 30 Year JGBs did not touch new lows in the Covid sell off, I knew we were in a new world. And from there yields have surged. I always wondered what the JGB market saw. My best guess was they foresaw the huge increase in US government spending under Biden.I also suspected they foresaw the huge budget deficits and tariffs of the Trump administration. All things I bunched under the “pro-labour” trade.All this led to the GLD/TLT trade, which has been great, with limited volatility, until this year.But this year, GLD/TLT has been correlated to the AI trade. Could JGBs have picked up the AI trade that early? And are they predicting the end? So time for some research.
- 4 days ago0 min
WHAT PUTS THE FEAR OF GOD INTO ME
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.russell-clark.comThe question that has been dogging me is whether the pro-labour trade, is just the AI trade - which is at its heart a supercycle in semis. Below are things that suggest end of cycle.
- 4 days ago2 min
INTO THE DARKNESS
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.russell-clark.comI read all the bear cases for the AI trade before. Over investment, rising cost of capital, fraud. I had seen them all before, and none of them had worked. The key to understanding the semi trade is understanding why semiconductors have turned from a deflationary product to an inflationary product. When you look at the PPI of semiconductor equipment, you can see how extraordinary it has been last few years.
- 5 days ago7 min
GLT/TLT AND DUMMYMANDERING
Going through the mid-term results, I came across a new word - dummymandering. Basically it refers to attempts at gerrymandering, as the Republicans tried in Texas, backfiring and turning safe seats unsafe. Texas, the most Republican of Republican states has in essence turned mainly Blue.Winning Governorship in Texas is a big deal, and a big surprise. Up until election day, it was not considered a likely outcome.Gina Hinojosa ran on a cost of living campaign, and in particular was keen on restricting expansion of data centres. If we look at flips in governorships, they are in states where the a large amount of expansion is planned, with Texas by far the largest.Generally speaking, mid-terms are a non-event. The party in power loses seats, and the legislative agenda slows. But the flip in Texas is a huge deal. Before the mid-terms, I would have said the change of a data centre build out slowing was relatively low, as all the main players were engaging in a capital war. But now, with the mid-terms, the chances of regulation slowing the data centre build out has increased. Now seeing the Texas results, I can understand why investors dumped semiconductors AND sold gold, and bought treasuries. The possibility of a cyclical slowdown has increased, and possible something like a dot-com bust.For me, the mid-terms and the win for Lula in Brazil shows that voters have tired of culture wars, and want more money. This is pro-labour trade I have been seeing for the last few years. But I can understand the weakness in this pro labour trade last month now. But on top of regulating data centres, Democrats also pushed for restoring Obamacare, increased government spending and lower taxes for households.I cannot work out if this is truly bearish for markets. The big players in the market have been whipsawed as they announce big spending plans. Do markets then reward them for scaling it back? Seems that way today. Or do they look for work arounds? And if hyperscalers do not build data centres in the US, do they build them overseas? Or do funding markets and IPO markets close to all things AI, and we have a dot com bust? I think Japan is the best place to look. It has pro-labour politics AND big exposure to AI. If JGB yields tank - then what I thought was pro-labour, was in fact the AI trade.I am always reluctant to trade around big political surprises. Market action has a way of bringing changes. Do Democrats comes out, and say they just want to regulate data centres and not slow them? Who knows. But at least I know what markets are looking at now. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.russell-clark.com/subscribe
- 6 days ago9 min
GLT/TLT AND THE MIDTERMS
GLD/TLT has been surprisingly weak this year, admittedly after a terrific run.It is not meant to be a economic trade, but a political trade. That is politicians will keep acting to favour labour, and wages, which means inflation should be stronger than expected. Looking at the last pro-labour era, you should end with a period where gold is strong and bonds are weak - a debt crisis, which then ushers in political change (There is a secondary trade of China swapping treasuries for gold - but we will leave that for the moment).But you can also portray GLD/TLT as a cyclical trade. If you think the cycle is going to turn, you definitely do not want to be short bonds, or long gold. If you think unemployment is going to go up in the US, you do not want to be in cyclical trades. Looking at initial jobless claims, taking a view we must be near a cyclical top is easy to make. It has been so good for so long, there are 36 year olds who have never seen a recession in their working life.It is hard to believe the last real recession in the US was nearly 20 years ago. The 70s, 80s, 90s and 2000s were all about recessions. It just became assumed they were unavoidable. Now my read is, that this politics of non-stop boom, or pro-labour politics will continue - until wages and asset prices have normalised. That is wages have caught up to asset prices. In a pro-labour world, that happens with inflation. In a free market world, that happens with the most enormous recession and bear market. I still think politics is pro-labour, so this seems unlikely to me. My read of the mid-terms is that the most pro-labour policy of Trump was to cut immigration. He was very successful at that. But high oil prices and cutting benefits was not pro-labour at all. At the end of the day, pro-labour is about giving workers more money, not rich people. So what do the mid-terms mean? Well I would expect the Democrats to advance a tax and spend budget, which Trump will veto, so you end up with just a spend budget. I see zero chance of the Democrats agreeing to any austerity. I also think market will start thinking about what a Democrat President will look like. Trump so thoroughly controls the Republican party, its hard to see how they can even put up a fight at the next presidential election. I would also see this as inflationary, but with the offset of tax increases. I suspect the long end of the Treasury curve should weaken (ie yields go higher).As mentioned previously, the “Starve the Beast” strategy of the Republicans is meant to leave Democrat administrations with no money to spend, and fiscal discipline to be enforced by the bond market. My best guess is we will need to see actual bond market stress before we see any political change. So politically, I see the mid term result as bullish for GLD/TLT. Economically the bear case is the Democrats legislated to end the data centre build out.Which given the roll over in the residential construction market would probably be the top in the cycle.Having looked at the plans for hyperscalers, and the way they think, I expect them to move data centres to wherever will have them, including Europe and Japan, that is until space becomes viable. Potentially a negative for the US and the US dollar. But the fear of being overtaken by China in AI should allow for negotiation on data centres - which is a political view. That is politics should keep the economic cycle going. I will keep leaning to the political view of GLD/TLT as long as JGB yields are tending higher.And I will finish with Russell Clark’s third iron law of politics. It does not matter which party you vote for, you end up with the same policies. I still see fiscal excess, tight immigration policy, tariffs and industrial policy continuing - at least until the voters tire of it. I do not see the mid-terms as a repudiation of that. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.russell-clark.com/subscribe
- 1 weeks ago14 min
AI HAS MORPHED FROM A CAPITAL WAR TO A NARRATIVE WAR
Earlier this year, I thought Softbank was worth a short. It had just raised debt at an 8% yield. Like many names in the AI space, its CDS were implying some problems. Usually, rising CDS is associated with equity weakness - but in Softbank’s case, shares have tended higher, if extremely volatile.This in contrast to Oracle, where equity valuation as CDS has risen. Oracle CDS has even exceeded 2008 highs.And in Oracle’s case shares are down 60% from a peak. Just looking at the share price above, you would assume that the dot com bust was already upon us. This is not the case, revenue growth has returned to Oracle after a decade of stagnation.In the most recent quarter, Oracle seems to have responded to share price and debt pressure, and found ways to cut capex. I would expect this to be nominally bullish - but so far nothing.What links Softbank and Open AI? Softbank is the biggest investor in OpenAI, and OpenAI is Oracle’s biggest customer. In other words, Softbank provides capital to OpenAI, and this capital is then used to fund the growth that Oracle is investing to supply.The big question is whether OpenAI can actually meet the commitments that it has made to Oracle. Some rough financials for Open AI are below. We can see from most recent filings that Anthropic is seeing USD 17bn of revenue for Q3 from USD1.3bn a year ago. So the revenue forecast for OpenAI for USD 70bn in 2027 looks achievable. The question is whether they can find the capital for the USD 300bn of forecast funding.If you are bearish, you can say there is no way that OpenAI and Anthropic can raise the cash they need. Whereas, when we look at SpaceX another company with big growth ambitions, it has raised USD100bn this year, making it the largest IPO of all time. That is OpenAI could get the capital from equity markets, as long as they stay open. In 2021, nearly USD 600bn was raised from IPO markets.That is the key issue. Can Anthropic and Open AI raise the capital for the growth forecasts? Or in other words, can and will the IPO market stay open? With debt markets expensive, the IPO market becomes all important. And IPO’s can be all about narratives. Tesla and now SpaceX are good examples. Both listed at extremely high valuations (EV/Sales of over 20), which provided the growth capital they needed, and the financial safety to tap debt markets. But IPO markets tend to be about narratives. In this case AI is going to take over the world, or it is just a capital destruction machine? The thing about narrative wars, is that the bears almost always lose in my experience. Tesla is probably the most relevant example. When it first listed, it was obvious that it needed more capital. Hence it attracted large short interest, but this inevitably lead to a short squeeze, which provide a more attractive level for Tesla to sell equity, which reduced the assumed dilution, which forced the valuation up, and so on and so forth. You can see short covering tended to occur with equity raises with Tesla. you can see how volume traded increased as equity was raised.Short interest in Oracle is now elevated.You might think Tesla was a one off occurrence - but we saw a similar dynamic with Strategy. Very high short interest led to Strategy pricing above NAV, giving the company the incentive to issues shares to buy Bitcoin, which helped created the upward surge in the cryptocurrency. As short interest has waned, crypto has struggled.The problem with winning the narrative war, is that bearish bets create the conditions for a company to win the capital war, which ironically would not have existed without the bearishness. Every short is a confirmed buyer at some point. And every short will have borrowed from a long owner, who cannot sell. The bears are winning the narrative story - but they are unlikely to win the capital story. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.russell-clark.com/subscribe
Get Capital Flows and Asset Markets summaries in your inbox
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
You Might Also Like
Podcasts in similar categories.
Coffeez with Joe Shalaby
Conversations with entrepreneurs, investors, and cultural figures reveal the real strategies, struggles, and costs behind success.
All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
Four tech investors discuss technology, markets, politics, and poker with candid, in-depth analysis.
Unblinded with Sean Callagy
A legally blind entrepreneur shares insights on ethical influence, peak performance, and mastering hidden patterns in business and life.
The Code To Winning
Interviews with business leaders, entrepreneurs, and CEOs reveal strategies and insights for success in the modern business world.
Planet Money
Explains how economic forces influence everyday life and global events through storytelling and deep dives into surprising topics.
The Room Podcast
Tech founders and funders share behind-the-scenes stories from pivotal moments in their careers.
Prof G Markets
Daily market news and analysis on earnings, geopolitics, Big Tech, and AI with clear, no-jargon insights.
The Level Up Podcast w/ Paul Alex
A former detective shares real stories and practical strategies on building passive income, financial freedom, and entrepreneurial success.
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from Capital Flows and Asset Markets in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's Capital Flows and Asset Markets daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of Capital Flows and Asset Markets as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the Capital Flows and Asset Markets podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official Capital Flows and Asset Markets product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Russell Clark.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts, any in the catalog. Basic raises that to 15, Pro to 40 and Max to 100. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
How often does Capital Flows and Asset Markets release new episodes?
Capital Flows and Asset Markets publishes every few days. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
What topics does Capital Flows and Asset Markets cover?
Capital Flows and Asset Markets covers topics including Business, Investing. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting Capital Flows and Asset Markets summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.