Rebellious, Not Revolutionary

Welcome back to Break, a Fallthrough aftershow! Kris and Matt continue the Go repository structure conversation by zooming in on the details. The pair discuss what they dislike about database libraries in Go, with a particular distaste for mocking. Then they have an extended discussion of Bryan Cantrill's "Complexity of Simplicity" quadrant framework from TalosCon. They argue Go was rebellious, but modules have been slid it into the accreted quadrant.Enjoying the aftershow? Let us know on social media! If you prefer to watch instead of just listen, head over to YouTube where you can watch this episode of Break!Thanks for tuning in and happy listening!Chapters:Prologue (00:00:00)Chapter 1: Go's database/sql Package Design and Magic Imports (00:01:24)Chapter 2: SQL Mocking Is Painful, Just Use a Real Database (00:04:23)Chapter 3: Global Side Effects and Why Nobody Will Fix Go's SQL (00:08:07)Chapter 4: Go Package Design and the Limits of Import Paths (00:12:31)Chapter 5: Bryan Cantrill's "Complexity of Simplicity" Quadrant Framework (00:17:49)Chapter 6: Where Does Go Actually Fit? Rebellious, Not Revolutionary (00:24:15)Chapter 7: Go Is Sliding Into "Accreted" Territory (00:33:04)Epilogue (00:39:30)Hosts Kris Brandow - Host Matthew Sanabria - Host Socials:WebsiteBlueskyThreadsX/TwitterLinkedInInstagram